Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

被引:1
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [2 ]
Myland, Melissa [2 ]
Nixon, Mark [2 ]
Gooch, Nick [3 ]
Shaunik, Alka [4 ]
Lew, Elisheva [5 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Diabet Ctr, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] IQVIA, London, England
[3] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[5] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
adherence; electronic medical records; glycaemic control; oral antidiabetic drugs; real-world study; treatment intensification; type 2 diabetes melitus; CLINICAL INERTIA; ADHERENCE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERSISTENCE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION; INSULIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/edm2.94
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real-world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods: Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (>58 mmol/mol [>7.5%] or >64 mmol/mol [>8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12 months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12 months post-index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results: A total of 10 832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6 months was -1.13% (intensifiers) vs -0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12 months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6 months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.86]), which was similar at 12 months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions: Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6 months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12 months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Titration of insulin glargine 100 U/mL when added to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the TOP-1 real-world study
    Pscherer, Stefan
    Anderten, Helmut
    Pfohl, Martin
    Fritsche, Andreas
    Borck, Anja
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Bramlage, Peter
    Seufert, Jochen
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2020, 57 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [22] Titration of insulin glargine 100 U/mL when added to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the TOP-1 real-world study
    Stefan Pscherer
    Helmut Anderten
    Martin Pfohl
    Andreas Fritsche
    Anja Borck
    Katrin Pegelow
    Peter Bramlage
    Jochen Seufert
    Acta Diabetologica, 2020, 57 : 89 - 99
  • [23] Optimal treatment intensification for glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on two oral agents: real world comparison of GLP-1, OADs and insulin
    Desouza, C.
    Kirk, A. Ross
    Mangla, K. Kant
    Wolden, M. Lyng
    Lingvay, I.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (SUPPL 1) : S286 - S287
  • [24] Intensification of Basal Insulin Therapy with Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting: The BASAL-LIXI Study
    Bellido, Diego
    Abellan, Pablo
    Palomar, Jose Manuel Ruiz
    Sintes, Rogelio Alvarez
    Nubiolae, Andreu
    Bellido, Virginia
    Romero, Gracia
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2018, 89 : 37 - 42
  • [25] Real-world use of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) significantly improves glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes
    Feher, M.
    Price, H.
    Schultes, B.
    Prager, R.
    Phan, T. M.
    Thorsted, B. L.
    Bluher, M.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 158 - 158
  • [26] Improved Clinical Outcomes with Dulaglutide as Add-on Medication to Oral Antidiabetic Drugs with or Without Insulin in Overweight Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Retrospective Study in a Real-World Setting
    Ghosh, Aneesh
    Nair, Rakhee
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2020, 16 (05) : 490 - 496
  • [27] Long-term sustainability of glycaemic achievements with second-line antidiabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world study
    Montvida, Olga
    Shaw, Jonathan E.
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Paul, Sanjoy K.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (07): : 1722 - 1731
  • [28] Evaluating the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin addition to insulin and oral antidiabetic medication (OAD) regimen in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and obese patients
    Sharif, Hina
    Sheikh, Sana Sharif
    Salman, Ambreen
    Jawed, Zahida
    Karim, Ishrat
    Sohail, Tehseena
    Mohsin, Nadia
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 37 (02) : 357 - 366
  • [29] Comparison of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and fixed combination oral antidiabetic treatment: results of a pilot study
    De Mattia, G.
    Laurenti, O.
    Moretti, A.
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2009, 46 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [30] Comparison of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and fixed combination oral antidiabetic treatment: results of a pilot study
    G. De Mattia
    O. Laurenti
    A. Moretti
    Acta Diabetologica, 2009, 46