Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

被引:1
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [2 ]
Myland, Melissa [2 ]
Nixon, Mark [2 ]
Gooch, Nick [3 ]
Shaunik, Alka [4 ]
Lew, Elisheva [5 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Diabet Ctr, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] IQVIA, London, England
[3] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[5] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
adherence; electronic medical records; glycaemic control; oral antidiabetic drugs; real-world study; treatment intensification; type 2 diabetes melitus; CLINICAL INERTIA; ADHERENCE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERSISTENCE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION; INSULIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/edm2.94
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real-world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods: Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (>58 mmol/mol [>7.5%] or >64 mmol/mol [>8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12 months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12 months post-index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results: A total of 10 832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6 months was -1.13% (intensifiers) vs -0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12 months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6 months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.86]), which was similar at 12 months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions: Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6 months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12 months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glycaemic control after treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on two or more non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in a real-world setting
    Canivell, Silvia
    Mata-Cases, Manel
    Real, Jordi
    Franch-Nadal, Josep
    Vlacho, Bogdan
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Gratacos, Monica
    Mauricio, Didac
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (06): : 1373 - 1380
  • [2] Real-World Titration of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs
    Seufert, Jochen
    Anderten, Helmut
    Borck, Anja
    Fritsche, Andreas
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Pscherer, Stefan
    DIABETES, 2017, 66 : A619 - A619
  • [3] Third-Line Antidiabetic Therapy Intensification Patterns and Glycaemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA: A Real-World Study
    Digsu N. Koye
    Olga Montvida
    Sanjoy Ketan Paul
    Drugs, 2020, 80 : 477 - 487
  • [4] Third-Line Antidiabetic Therapy Intensification Patterns and Glycaemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA: A Real-World Study
    Koye, Digsu N.
    Montvida, Olga
    Paul, Sanjoy Ketan
    DRUGS, 2020, 80 (05) : 477 - 487
  • [5] The Impact of Age on Real-World Titration of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs
    Fritsche, Andreas
    Anderten, Helmut
    Borck, Anja
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Pfohl, Martin
    Pscherer, Stefan
    Seufert, Jochen
    DIABETES, 2017, 66 : A619 - A619
  • [6] Real-world titration of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs: an analysis in 2308 patients in primary care in Germany
    Seufert, J.
    Anderten, H.
    Borck, A.
    Fritsche, A.
    Pegelow, K.
    Pscherer, S.
    Pfohl, M.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S36 - S36
  • [7] Evaluating Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin: UK ATTAIN Real-World Study
    Edward B. Jude
    Mark Nixon
    Caroline O’Leary
    Melissa Myland
    Nick Gooch
    Alka Shaunik
    Elisheva Lew
    Diabetes Therapy, 2019, 10 : 1847 - 1858
  • [8] Evaluating Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin: UK ATTAIN Real-World Study
    Jude, Edward B.
    Nixon, Mark
    O'Leary, Caroline
    Myland, Melissa
    Gooch, Nick
    Shaunik, Alka
    Lew, Elisheva
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (05) : 1847 - 1858
  • [9] Switching to insulin degludec (IDeg) improves glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting
    Feher, M.
    Tentolouris, N.
    Knudsen, S.
    Lapolla, A.
    Prager, R.
    Phan, T. M.
    Wolden, M. L.
    Schultes, B.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 203 - 203
  • [10] Insulin glulisine improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients not optimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: results of a randomised controlled study
    Woo, J. -T.
    Kim, S. -W
    Baik, S. -H.
    Yoon, K. -H.
    Kawamori, R.
    Iwamoto, Y.
    Kadowaki, T.
    Iwasaki, M.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2008, 51 : S400 - S400