The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy

被引:87
|
作者
Cash, Hannes [1 ]
Maxeiner, Andreas [1 ]
Stephan, Carsten [1 ]
Fischer, Thomas [2 ]
Durmus, Tahir [2 ]
Holzmann, Josephine [1 ]
Asbach, Patrick [2 ]
Haas, Matthias [2 ]
Hinz, Stefan [1 ]
Neymeyer, Joerg [1 ]
Miller, Kurt [1 ]
Guenzel, Karsten [1 ]
Kempkensteffen, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Urol, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Radiol, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
关键词
PI-RADS; Prostate biopsy; Targeted biopsy; Real-time MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy; Prostate cancer/diagnosis; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; IDENTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; PROTOCOL; 12-CORE; ANTIGEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-015-1671-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the performance of real-time MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB) in men with primary and repeat biopsies and correlate the prostate cancer detection rate (CDR) with the PI-RADS score. Analysis included 408 consecutive men with primary and prior negative biopsies who underwent TB and 10-core random biopsy (RB) between January 2012 and January 2015. TB was performed with a real-time MRI/US fusion platform with sensor-based registration. Clinically significant PCa was defined as Gleason score (GS) a parts per thousand yen7 or GS 6 with maximal cancer core length a parts per thousand yen4 mm for TB and according to Epstein criteria for RB. The overall CDR was 56 % (227/408). The CDR for primary biopsy was 74 % (60/81) and 57 % (67/117), 49 % (62/126), 45 % (38/84) for patients with 1, 2 and a parts per thousand yen3 prior negative biopsies. CDRs correlated with PI-RADS 2/3/4/5 were 16 % (5/32), 26 % (29/113), 62 % (94/152) and 89 % (99/111), respectively. The rates of significant tumors in relation to PI-RADS 2/3/4/5 were 60 % (3/5), 66 % (19/29), 74 % (70/94), 95 % (94/99). In 139 (61 %) cases with radical prostatectomy (RP), the rates of a parts per thousand yenpT3 tumors in correlation with PI-RADS 4 and 5 were 20 % (11/56) and 49 % (32/65). PI-RADS constituted the strongest predictor of significant PCa detection (p < 0.007). Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided TB combined with RB improved PCa detection in patients with primary and repeat biopsies. The CDR was strongly correlated with a rising PI-RADS score, values of 4 and 5 increasing the detection of clinically significant tumors and leading to a higher histological stage after RP.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CLINICAL UTILITY OF PSA DENSITY AND PI-RADS FOR DEFERRING BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Truong, Matthew
    Stevens, Erica
    Ward, Ryan
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Austhof, Ethan
    Valdez, Rogelio
    Purysko, Andrei
    Klein, Eric
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1104 - E1104
  • [42] Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naive patients
    Washino, Satoshi
    Okochi, Tomohisa
    Saito, Kimitoshi
    Konishi, Tsuzumi
    Hirai, Masaru
    Kobayashi, Yutaka
    Miyagawa, Tomoaki
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [43] Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Kim, See Hyung
    Choi, Mi Sun
    Kim, Mi Jung
    Kim, Young Hwan
    Cho, Seung Hyun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (04) : 800 - 805
  • [44] Diagnostic performance of targeted transrectal MRI-Ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yuwono, A.
    Tan, T. -W.
    Yeow, Y.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tan, C. -H.
    Chong, K. -T.
    Lee, Y. -M.
    Png, K. -S.
    Tan, Y. -K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 19 - 19
  • [45] A PI-RADS STRATIFIED RISK CALCULATOR FOR PREDICTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AT BIOPSY
    Andreas, Darian
    Nethala, Daniel
    Pandya, Shashank
    Alaiev, Daniel
    Samadder, Aishe
    Lee, Jeffrey
    Martinez, Mariela
    Hall, Simon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1007 - E1007
  • [46] The Value of Low Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    Moon, Sung-Kyoung
    Lim, Joo-Won
    Jeon, Seung-Hyun
    Lee, Sang-Hyub
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (05):
  • [47] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06): : 1888 - 1889
  • [48] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1754 - 1754
  • [49] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Leow, J.
    Yeow, Y.
    Tan, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 84 - 85
  • [50] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yeow, Y.
    Leow, J.
    Tan, T. W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 31 - 31