The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy

被引:87
|
作者
Cash, Hannes [1 ]
Maxeiner, Andreas [1 ]
Stephan, Carsten [1 ]
Fischer, Thomas [2 ]
Durmus, Tahir [2 ]
Holzmann, Josephine [1 ]
Asbach, Patrick [2 ]
Haas, Matthias [2 ]
Hinz, Stefan [1 ]
Neymeyer, Joerg [1 ]
Miller, Kurt [1 ]
Guenzel, Karsten [1 ]
Kempkensteffen, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Urol, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Radiol, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
关键词
PI-RADS; Prostate biopsy; Targeted biopsy; Real-time MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy; Prostate cancer/diagnosis; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; IDENTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; PROTOCOL; 12-CORE; ANTIGEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-015-1671-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the performance of real-time MRI/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB) in men with primary and repeat biopsies and correlate the prostate cancer detection rate (CDR) with the PI-RADS score. Analysis included 408 consecutive men with primary and prior negative biopsies who underwent TB and 10-core random biopsy (RB) between January 2012 and January 2015. TB was performed with a real-time MRI/US fusion platform with sensor-based registration. Clinically significant PCa was defined as Gleason score (GS) a parts per thousand yen7 or GS 6 with maximal cancer core length a parts per thousand yen4 mm for TB and according to Epstein criteria for RB. The overall CDR was 56 % (227/408). The CDR for primary biopsy was 74 % (60/81) and 57 % (67/117), 49 % (62/126), 45 % (38/84) for patients with 1, 2 and a parts per thousand yen3 prior negative biopsies. CDRs correlated with PI-RADS 2/3/4/5 were 16 % (5/32), 26 % (29/113), 62 % (94/152) and 89 % (99/111), respectively. The rates of significant tumors in relation to PI-RADS 2/3/4/5 were 60 % (3/5), 66 % (19/29), 74 % (70/94), 95 % (94/99). In 139 (61 %) cases with radical prostatectomy (RP), the rates of a parts per thousand yenpT3 tumors in correlation with PI-RADS 4 and 5 were 20 % (11/56) and 49 % (32/65). PI-RADS constituted the strongest predictor of significant PCa detection (p < 0.007). Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided TB combined with RB improved PCa detection in patients with primary and repeat biopsies. The CDR was strongly correlated with a rising PI-RADS score, values of 4 and 5 increasing the detection of clinically significant tumors and leading to a higher histological stage after RP.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association Between Tumor Multifocality on Multi-parametric MRI and Detection of Clinically-Significant Prostate Cancer in Lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score 4
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Swallow, Matthew
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 134 : 173 - 180
  • [22] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    Aileen O’Shea
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 523 - 532
  • [23] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    O'Shea, Aileen
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 523 - 532
  • [24] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Turkbey, Baris
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (06) : 1179 - 1183
  • [25] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know?
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    El-Diasty, Tarek
    Elhendy, Ahmed
    Fahmy, Dalia
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 79 : 183 - 200
  • [26] Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) : 1112 - 1121
  • [27] Diagnostic value of prostate imaging - reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 in the Chinese population: a correlation study with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion targeted biopsy
    Ma, W. K.
    Lai, A. S. H.
    Lam, K. C.
    Yip, L. K. C.
    Ho, B. S. H.
    Wong, J. K. W.
    Wong, C. K. W.
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Tsang, C. F.
    Ng, A. T. L.
    Tsu, J. H. L.
    Yiu, M. K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 9 - 9
  • [28] Predictive ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting prostate cancer and its clinical significance in MRI-targeted biopsy for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions
    Erkan, A.
    Ozcan, S. G. Gur
    Erkan, M.
    Barali, D.
    Koc, A.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 80
  • [29] Impact of changing PI-RADS cutoff on prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive fusion biopsy in biopsy-naive patients
    El-Helaly, Hesham Abdel-Azim
    Mahmoud, Asem Abdel-Aziz
    Magdy, Ahmed Mohamed
    Hasehem, Abdelwahab
    Ibrahim, Hamdy Mohamed
    Mohamed, Khaled Moheyelden
    Ismail, Mohamed Hamdy
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 35 (01)
  • [30] Living systematic review and meta-analysis of the prostate MRI diagnostic test with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment for the detection of prostate cancer: study protocol
    Oerther, Benedict
    Schmucker, Christine
    Schwarzer, Guido
    Schoots, Ivo
    Sigle, August
    Gratzke, Christian
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Benndorf, Matthias
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):