Use of Stay-in-Place Forms for Concrete Bridge Decks in Tennessee

被引:0
|
作者
Knight, Marcus L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Concrete Ind Management Program, Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2098-14
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bridge decks, concrete or otherwise, represent one of the most heavily deteriorated components of typical highway bridges. Bridge construction continues to proceed at high volume, and in the past, bridge repair, rehabilitation, and replacement increased as well. Enormous amounts of funding are required to support initial construction and repairs as needed. This national trend is also evident within the Tennessee bridge inventory, which currently numbers approximately 20,000, with a majority of the structures utilizing concrete cast-in-place decks. Because of the increasing volume of work and limited funding, efficient methods of constructing and repairing concrete bridge decks have been of interest during the past decades. Durable, high-quality bridge decks have been constructed in Tennessee with three primary forming systems: temporary forms and falsework anti stay-in-place form systems consisting of precast concrete panels and permanent steel forms. Each of these form systems is discussed, with a description of typical applications and estimation of the frequency of use. Currently, cast-in-place decks in Tennessee represent approximately 60% of the inventory and are predominantly (90%) cast by using permanent steel forms. The effects of stay-in-place forms on finished cast-in-place decks were investigated as well as form durability and inspection and repair considerations. This information was obtained through review of Tennessee Department of Transportation specifications and standard drawings and interviews of department personnel.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental Investigation of the Natural Bonding Strength between Stay-In-Place Form and Concrete in FRP-Concrete Decks/Beams
    Gong, Jianwu
    Zou, Xingxing
    Xia, Ping
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [22] FRP stay-in-place form and shear key connection for FRP-concrete hybrid beams/decks
    Zou, Xingxing
    Feng, Peng
    Wang, Jingquan
    Wu, Yuwei
    Feng, Yu
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2018, 192 : 489 - 499
  • [23] Building in Concrete with an Ultra-lightweight Knitted Stay-in-place Formwork: Prototype of a Concrete Shell Bridge
    Popescu, M.
    Reiter, L.
    Liew, A.
    Van Mele, T.
    Flatt, R. J.
    Block, P.
    STRUCTURES, 2018, 14 : 322 - 332
  • [24] Stay-in-place wall forms revolutionize home construction
    Munsell, W.Keith
    Aberdeen's Concrete Construction, 1995, 40 (01):
  • [25] FRP Stay-in-Place Forms for Concrete Structures - Sessions at the ACI Spring Convention 2008: Preface
    Fam, Amir Z.
    2008, American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331, United States
  • [26] Concrete Floor with GFRP-Embedded I-Beams and Stay-in-Place Structural Forms
    Boules, Philopateer
    Fam, Amir
    Genikomsou, Aikaterini S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 25 (02)
  • [27] Durability of Bridge Deck with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms under Freeze-Thaw Cycles
    Boles, Raouf
    Nelson, Mark
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [28] New Bridge Deck Cast onto Corrugated GFRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms with Interlocking Connections
    Fam, Amir
    Nelson, Mark
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 16 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [29] The effects of splices and bond on performance of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place forms at various boundary conditions
    Nelson, Mark
    Eldridge, Amanda
    Fam, Amir
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 56 : 509 - 516
  • [30] An investigation on bond between FRP stay-in-place formwork and concrete
    Goyal, Reema
    Mukherjee, Abhijit
    Goyal, Shweta
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 113 : 741 - 751