The effects of splices and bond on performance of bridge deck with FRP stay-in-place forms at various boundary conditions

被引:22
|
作者
Nelson, Mark [1 ]
Eldridge, Amanda [1 ]
Fam, Amir [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Eng, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
Bridge deck; GFRP; Stay-in-place form; Shear; Splice; Bond; SHEAR-STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.031
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
An investigation is conducted on a novel system of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) stay in place (SIP) structural formwork for concrete bridge decks. The deck system is composed of FRP composite ribbed panels, spanning between girders and acting as both permanent formwork and bottom slab reinforcement. The testing, conducted at 1:2.75 scale, consisted of ten bridge deck sections and examined several critical parameters, namely: varying of the width (w) of the deck specimens relative to their spans (s), and varying interface bond condition, concrete strength and loading location on the deck. It was shown that as the width (w) is increased relative to span (s), the performance of the deck approaches the actual built performance. An aspect ratio (w/s) of greater than 1.6 was found to adequately represent performance and avoid overly conservative results produced at lower aspect ratios. Varying concrete strength from 17 MPa to 42 MPa in identical decks resulted in 20% increased capacity but did not influence stiffness. Applying adhesive bond at FRP-concrete interface to create a fully composite section increased the deck strength and initial stiffness by 30% and 73%, respectively. In decks with adhesive bond, loading directly above the FRP splice resulted in a 20% lower strength than loading half-way between splices. This is an opposite trend to that observed in decks without adhesive bond. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Splices of FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms in Concrete Bridge Decks
    Nelson, Mark
    Beriker, Emir
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 18 (04)
  • [2] Influence of stay-in-place forms on concrete bridge deck corrosion
    Balakumaran, Soundar S. G., 1600, American Concrete Institute (111):
  • [3] Concrete bridge deck stresses induced by stay-in-place forms
    Riad, Mourad Y.
    William, Gergis W.
    Shoukry, Samir N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 167 (02) : 111 - 121
  • [4] Durability of Bridge Deck with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms under Freeze-Thaw Cycles
    Boles, Raouf
    Nelson, Mark
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [5] Full bridge testing at scale constructed with novel FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete deck
    Nelson, Mark
    Fam, Amir
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2014, 50 : 368 - 376
  • [6] Combined loading of a bridge deck reinforced with a structural FRP stay-in-place form
    Hanus, Joseph P.
    Bank, Lawrence C.
    Oliva, Michael G.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 23 (04) : 1605 - 1619
  • [7] Design Equations for Concrete Bridge Decks with FRP Stay-in-Place Structural Forms
    Noel, Martin
    Fam, Amir
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016, 20 (05)
  • [8] Effect of stay-in-place metal forms on performance of concrete bridge decks
    Guthrie, W. Spencer
    Frost, Stephen L.
    Birdsall, Aimee W.
    Linford, Ellen T.
    Ross, Laren A.
    Crane, Rebecca A.
    Eggett, Dennis L.
    MANAGING AND MAINTAINING HIGHWAY STRUCTURES AND PAVEMENTS, 2006, (1958): : 33 - 41
  • [9] Innovative bridge deck solutions: Examining the impact response and capacity of UHPC with FRP stay-in-place formworks
    Pournasiri, Emad
    Pham, Thong M.
    Hao, Hong
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 315
  • [10] PRECAST CONCRETE DECK PANELS SERVE AS STAY-IN-PLACE FORMS
    不详
    HIGHWAY & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, 1984, 127 (01): : 62 - 63