Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:0
|
作者
McNeese, Nathan J. [1 ]
Demir, Mustafa [2 ]
Chiou, Erin [2 ]
Cooke, Nancy [2 ]
Yanikian, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES | 2019年
关键词
AUTOMATION; COOPERATION; RESILIENCE; SUPPORT; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This study aims to better understand trust in human autonomy teams, finding that trust is related to team performance. A wizard of oz methodology was used in an experiment to simulate an autonomous agent as a team member in a remotely piloted aircraft system environment. Specific focuses of the study were team performance and team social behaviors (specifically trust) of human-autonomy teams. Results indicate 1) that there are lower levels of trust in the autonomous agent in low performing teams than both medium and high performing teams, 2) there is a loss of trust in the autonomous agent across low, medium, and high performing teams over time, and 3) that in addition to the human team members indicating low levels of trust in the autonomous agent, both low and medium performing teams also indicated lower levels of trust in their human team members.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 263
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Visualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technologyVisualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technologyM. Walter et al.
    Mathew Walter
    Avanthika Vineetha Harish
    Luke Christison
    Kimberly Tam
    WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 2025, 24 (1) : 5 - 31
  • [32] Multi-sensor fusion architecture for human-autonomy teaming
    Nothwang, William D.
    Gremillion, Gregory M.
    Donavanik, Daniel
    Haynes, Benjamin A.
    Atwater, Corey S.
    Canady, Jonroy D.
    Metcalfe, Jason S.
    Marathe, Amar R.
    2016 RESILIENCE WEEK (RWS), 2016, : 166 - 171
  • [33] The Evaluation of a Playbook Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming in Single Pilot Operations
    Tokadli, Guliz
    Dorneich, Michael C.
    Matessa, Michael
    Eda, Seiya
    2019 IEEE/AIAA 38TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2019,
  • [34] Modelling situated intent for human-autonomy teaming: a human-centric approach
    Hammarback, Jimmy
    Johansson, Bjoern J. E.
    Alfredson, Jens
    Lundberg, Jonas
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2024, 25 (06) : 731 - 752
  • [35] Application of the GORITE BDI Framework to Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Case Study
    Noorunnisa S.
    Jarvis D.
    Jarvis J.
    Watson M.
    Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 2019, 27 (01): : 13 - 24
  • [36] Observable and Attention-Directing BDI Agents for Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Archibald, Blair
    Calder, Muffy
    Sevegnani, Michele
    Xu, Mengwei
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (348): : 167 - 175
  • [37] Human-Autonomy Teaming Interface Design for Multiple-UAV Control
    Fedulin A.M.
    Evstaf’ev D.V.
    Kondrashova G.L.
    Artemenko N.V.
    Russian Aeronautics, 2022, 65 (02): : 419 - 424
  • [38] A supportive situation awareness model for human-autonomy teaming in collaborative driving
    Kridalukmana, Rinta
    Lu, Hai Yan
    Naderpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2020, 21 (06) : 658 - 683
  • [39] Sub-patterns for Human-Autonomy Teaming: Variations on a Delegation Theme
    Miller, Christopher A.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, (EPCE 2016), 2016, 9736 : 198 - 210
  • [40] Modeling operator self-assessment in human-autonomy teaming settings
    Cummings, Mary L.
    Li, Songpo
    Zhu, Haibei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2022, 157