Understanding the Role of Trust in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:0
|
作者
McNeese, Nathan J. [1 ]
Demir, Mustafa [2 ]
Chiou, Erin [2 ]
Cooke, Nancy [2 ]
Yanikian, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
AUTOMATION; COOPERATION; RESILIENCE; SUPPORT; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This study aims to better understand trust in human autonomy teams, finding that trust is related to team performance. A wizard of oz methodology was used in an experiment to simulate an autonomous agent as a team member in a remotely piloted aircraft system environment. Specific focuses of the study were team performance and team social behaviors (specifically trust) of human-autonomy teams. Results indicate 1) that there are lower levels of trust in the autonomous agent in low performing teams than both medium and high performing teams, 2) there is a loss of trust in the autonomous agent across low, medium, and high performing teams over time, and 3) that in addition to the human team members indicating low levels of trust in the autonomous agent, both low and medium performing teams also indicated lower levels of trust in their human team members.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 263
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Distributed Simulation to Investigate Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Matessa, Michael
    Vu, Kim-Phuong L.
    Strybe, Thomas Z.
    Battiste, Vernol
    Schnell, Thomas
    Cover, Mathew
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 541 - 550
  • [22] A Design and Description Method for Human-Autonomy Teaming Systems
    Schulte, Axel
    Donath, Diana
    INTELLIGENT HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, IHSI 2018, 2018, 722 : 3 - 9
  • [23] Validating metrics for reward alignment in human-autonomy teaming
    Sanneman, Lindsay
    Shah, Julie A.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 146
  • [24] A Design Pattern for Working Agreements in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Gutzwiller, Robert S.
    Espinosa, Sarah H.
    Kenny, Caitlin
    Lange, Douglas S.
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN SIMULATION AND MODELING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 591 : 12 - 24
  • [25] Operationally Realistic Human-Autonomy Teaming Task Simulation to Study Multi-Dimensional Trust
    Sung, Jaekeun
    Leary, Sarah
    Hurd, Victoria S.
    Lee, Christian
    Qin, Yimin
    Kong, Zhaodan
    Clark, Torin K.
    Anderson, Allison
    COMPANION OF THE 2024 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2024 COMPANION, 2024, : 1028 - 1032
  • [26] Human-Autonomy Teaming and Explainable AI Capabilities in RTS Games
    Lucero, Crisrael
    Izumigawa, Christianne
    Frederiksen, Kurt
    Nans, Lena
    Iden, Rebecca
    Lange, Douglas S.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS. COGNITION AND DESIGN, EPCE 2020, PT II, 2020, 12187 : 161 - 171
  • [27] Trustworthy Human-Autonomy Teaming for Proportionality Assessment in Military Operations
    Maathuis, Clara
    2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ICAPAI, 2024, : 89 - 96
  • [28] Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 46 : 3 - 12
  • [29] A Human-Autonomy Teaming Approach for a Flight-Following Task
    Brandt, Summer L.
    Lachter, Joel
    Russell, Ricky
    Shively, Robert Jay
    ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 586 : 12 - 22
  • [30] Visualisation of cyber vulnerabilities in maritime human-autonomy teaming technology
    Walter, Mathew
    Harish, Avanthika Vineetha
    Christison, Luke
    Tam, Kimberly
    WMU JOURNAL OF MARITIME AFFAIRS, 2025,