Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence in Selected Disabilities Over 10 Years

被引:26
|
作者
Deroche, Chelsea B. [1 ]
McDermott, Suzanne W. [2 ]
Mann, Joshua R. [3 ]
Hardin, James W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Biostat & Res Design Unit, DC 018-00 1 Hosp Dr, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Jackson, MS USA
关键词
HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; CARE ACCESS; WOMEN; BARRIERS; RECEIPT; MAMMOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the U.S.; however, if the population aged 50 years or older received routine screening, approximately 60% of these deaths could be eliminated. This study investigates whether adults, aged 50-75 years, with one of three disabilities (blind/ low vision [BLV], intellectual disability [ID], spinal cord injury [SCI]) receive CRC screening at rates equivalent to adults without the three disabilities, by accounting for combinations of recommended CRC screenings during a 10-year period (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood test). Methods: South Carolina Medicaid and Medicare, State Health Plan, and hospital discharge data (2000-2009) were analyzed (2013-2015) to estimate the proportion of adherence to and adjusted odds of CRC screening over time among adults with one of the three disabilities, BLV, ID, or SCI, versus adults without these conditions. Results: The estimated proportion of adults who adhere to changing recommendations over time was lower for adults with ID (34.32%) or SCI (44.14%) compared with those without these disabilities (48.48%). All three case groups had significantly lower AORs of adherence versus those without (BLV: AOR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80, 0.96; ID: AOR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.59; SCI: AOR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95). Conclusions: In this study, adults with BLV, ID, or SCI were less likely to receive and adhere to CRC screening recommendations than those without these disabilities. This method provides a thorough evaluation of adherence to CRC screening by considering levels of adherence during each month of Medicaid or Medicare coverage. (C) 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 741
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE ADHERENCE IN COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING
    MYERS, RE
    ROSS, EA
    WOLF, TA
    BALSHEM, A
    JEPSON, C
    MILLNER, L
    MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (10) : 1039 - 1050
  • [42] Screening Adherence for Colorectal Cancer Among Immigrant Hispanic Women
    Ellison, Jennie
    Jandorf, Lina
    Villagra, Cristina
    Winkel, Gary
    DuHamel, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 103 (08) : 681 - 688
  • [43] EFFECTS OF VA ONCWATCH INTERVENTION ON COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING ADHERENCE
    Bian, J.
    Fisher, D.
    Lipscomb, J.
    Ribeiro, M.
    Byrd-Sellers, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A43 - A43
  • [44] Patient support program increases colorectal cancer screening adherence
    Rochelle, RB
    Rosenberg, JL
    Mitchell, WR
    Berger, BM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (09): : S394 - S395
  • [45] Method of Recommendation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Impacts Adherence
    Inadomi, John M.
    Vijan, Sandeep
    Janz, Nancy K.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Thomas, Jennifer P.
    Lin, Yunghui-Vivien
    Munoz, Roxana
    Lau, Chim
    Somsouk, Ma
    El-Nachef, Najwa
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S23 - S23
  • [46] Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality
    D'Andrea, Elvira
    Ahnen, D. J.
    Sussman, D. A.
    Najafzadeh, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [47] Adherence to colorectal cancer screening measured as the proportion of time covered
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    Sigel, Bianca M.
    Yang, Edward
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Halm, Ethan A.
    Gupta, Samir
    Sanders, Joanne M.
    McCallister, Katharine
    Singal, Amit G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 88 (02) : 323 - +
  • [48] Screening for colorectal cancer: awareness and adherence among Italian women
    Pelullo, Concetta Paola
    Torsiello, Livio
    Della Polla, Giorgia
    Di Giuseppe, Gabriella
    Pavia, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 34 (12) : 1231 - 1237
  • [49] The Adherence of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Internal Medicine Clinics Compared with Other Recommended Cancer Screening
    Kijsirichareanchai, Kunut
    Mankongpaisarnrung, Charoen
    Sutamtewagul, Grerk
    Soape, Matthew
    Panamonta, Naree
    Rakvit, Ariwan
    Phy, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S629 - S629
  • [50] Predictors of prostate and colorectal cancer screening adherence among men registered for prostate cancer screening
    Red, S.
    Davis, K. M.
    Schwartz, M. D.
    Williams, R. M.
    Ahaghotu, C.
    Taylor, K. L.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (02) : 464 - 464