Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence in Selected Disabilities Over 10 Years

被引:26
|
作者
Deroche, Chelsea B. [1 ]
McDermott, Suzanne W. [2 ]
Mann, Joshua R. [3 ]
Hardin, James W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Biostat & Res Design Unit, DC 018-00 1 Hosp Dr, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Jackson, MS USA
关键词
HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; CARE ACCESS; WOMEN; BARRIERS; RECEIPT; MAMMOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the U.S.; however, if the population aged 50 years or older received routine screening, approximately 60% of these deaths could be eliminated. This study investigates whether adults, aged 50-75 years, with one of three disabilities (blind/ low vision [BLV], intellectual disability [ID], spinal cord injury [SCI]) receive CRC screening at rates equivalent to adults without the three disabilities, by accounting for combinations of recommended CRC screenings during a 10-year period (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood test). Methods: South Carolina Medicaid and Medicare, State Health Plan, and hospital discharge data (2000-2009) were analyzed (2013-2015) to estimate the proportion of adherence to and adjusted odds of CRC screening over time among adults with one of the three disabilities, BLV, ID, or SCI, versus adults without these conditions. Results: The estimated proportion of adults who adhere to changing recommendations over time was lower for adults with ID (34.32%) or SCI (44.14%) compared with those without these disabilities (48.48%). All three case groups had significantly lower AORs of adherence versus those without (BLV: AOR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80, 0.96; ID: AOR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.59; SCI: AOR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.95). Conclusions: In this study, adults with BLV, ID, or SCI were less likely to receive and adhere to CRC screening recommendations than those without these disabilities. This method provides a thorough evaluation of adherence to CRC screening by considering levels of adherence during each month of Medicaid or Medicare coverage. (C) 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 741
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Comorbid Conditions on Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Lukin, Dana J.
    Jandorf, Lina H.
    Dhulkifl, Rayhana J.
    Thelemaque, Linda D.
    Christie, Jennifer A.
    Itzkowitz, Steven H.
    DuHamel, Katherine N.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2012, 27 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [22] Colorectal cancer information avoidance is associated with screening adherence
    Heather Orom
    Nolan E. Ramer
    Natasha C. Allard
    Amy McQueen
    Erika A. Waters
    Marc T. Kiviniemi
    Jennifer L. Hay
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2024, 47 : 504 - 514
  • [23] BUDGET IMPACT OF IMPROVING ADHERENCE TO COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
    Hathway, J.
    Miller-Wilson, L. A.
    Jensen, I
    Ozbay, A. B.
    Regan, C.
    Yao, W.
    Jena, A. B.
    Weinstein, M. C.
    Parks, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S49 - S49
  • [24] Commentary: adherence and detection rates in colorectal cancer screening
    Hilmi, I.
    Goh, K. -L.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 37 (01) : 156 - 157
  • [25] Colorectal cancer information avoidance is associated with screening adherence
    Orom, Heather
    Ramer, Nolan E.
    Allard, Natasha C.
    Mcqueen, Amy
    Waters, Erika A.
    Kiviniemi, Marc T.
    Hay, Jennifer L.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2024, 47 (03) : 504 - 514
  • [26] Physician Recommendation and Patient Adherence for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Hudson, Shawna V.
    Ferrante, Jeanne M.
    Ohman-Strickland, Pamela
    Hahn, Karissa A.
    Shaw, Eric K.
    Hemler, Jennifer
    Crabtree, Benjamin F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (06) : 782 - 791
  • [27] Strategies to Improve Persistent Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Sen Kew, Guan
    Koh, Calvin Jianyi
    GUT AND LIVER, 2020, 14 (05) : 546 - 552
  • [28] Effect of Comorbid Conditions on Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Dana J. Lukin
    Lina H. Jandorf
    Rayhana J. Dhulkifl
    Linda D. Thélémaque
    Jennifer A. Christie
    Steven H. Itzkowitz
    Katherine N. DuHamel
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2012, 27 : 269 - 276
  • [29] Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Varies by Race/Ethnicity and Screening Strategy
    Inadomi, John M.
    Vijan, Sandeep
    Janz, Nancy K.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Thomas, Jennifer P.
    Lin, Yunghui-Vivien
    Munoz, Roxana
    Lau, Chim
    Somsouk, Ma
    El-Nachef, Najwa
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 138 (05) : S152 - S152
  • [30] Three years of colorectal cancer screening in Denmark
    Njor, Sisse Helle
    Friis-Hansen, Lennart
    Andersen, Berit
    Sondergaard, Bo
    Linnemann, Dorte
    Jorgensen, Jens Christian Riis
    Roikjar, Ole
    Rasmusseng, Morten
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 57 : 39 - 44