Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: validity and reliability

被引:6
|
作者
Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian [1 ]
Fonseca, Carlos Luques [2 ]
da Silva Gruninger, Bruno Leonardo [3 ]
Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos UFSCar, Phys Therapy Dept, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fac Anhanguera, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
[3] Fac Sudoeste Paulista, Itapetininga, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Paulista, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Surveys and questionnaires; Outcome assessment; Patient-reported outcome measures; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility; Physical therapy; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE; PORTUGUESE VERSION; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; TRANSLATION; DISABILITY; INDEX; VALIDATION; LANGUAGE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.02.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The Bournemouth Questionnaire is a comprehensive and short form multidimensional instrument developed to evaluate the health status of individuals with low back pain. The objective of this study was to verify the construct validity and the test-retest reliability of the Brazilian version of Bournemouth Questionnaire in individuals with low back pain. Methods: This is a methodological study that included 65 patients with low back pain. The Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was applied twice, and the test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and internal consistency. The construct validity of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and also with the following questionnaires: Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results: The total score of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire showed ICC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90), Cronbach's alpha of 0.85, SEM of 5.97, and MDC of 15.54, without evidence of ceiling and floor effects. The total score of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was correlated to the NPRS for current (r = 0.64), highest (r = 0.49), and lowest (r = 0.67) pain as well as scores on the RMDQ (r = 0.58), ODI (r = 0.42), and SF-36 (r = -0.58). Conclusion: The total score of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable to be used with patients with low back pain. (C) 2020 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 77
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: translation and cultural adaptation
    Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy
    Fonseca, Carlos Luques
    Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 137 (03): : 262 - 269
  • [2] Bournemouth questionnaire Arabic version: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability for patients with low back pain
    Elerian, Ahmed Ebrahim
    Abdel-Aal, Nabil Mahmoud
    Abdelhay, Mohamed Ibrahim
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 25 (03)
  • [3] Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain
    Blum-Fowler C.
    Peterson C.
    McChurch J.F.
    Le Clech Y.
    Humphreys B.K.
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 21 (1)
  • [4] Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for acute low back pain
    Lopes, Renata Antunes
    Dias, Rosangela Correa
    de Queiroz, Barbara Zille
    de Britto Rosa, Nayza Maciel
    Maximo Pereira, Leani de Souza
    Domingues Dias, Joao Marcos
    Magalhaes, Livia de Castro
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2015, 73 (05) : 436 - 444
  • [5] Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, Onur
    Gafuroglu, Umit
    Yuksel, Selcen
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 65 (01): : 59 - 66
  • [6] The Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version
    Agce, Zeynep Bahadir
    Sahin, Sedef
    Yaran, Mahmut
    Yuce, Deniz
    Bumin, Gonca
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 43 (07) : 708 - 713
  • [7] Health locus of control questionnaire for patients with chronic low back pain: psychometric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version
    Oliveira, Vinicius
    Furiati, Thiago
    Sakamoto, Ana
    Ferreira, Paulo
    Ferreira, Manuela
    Maher, Chris
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 13 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [8] Italian version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for Low Back Pain: translation, cultural adaptation and validation
    D'Onofrio, Angelica
    Pigliapoco, Elisa
    Torcisi, Raimondo
    Troiani, Alessandro
    Libertini, Tania
    Politi, Stefano
    Marsocci, Antonio
    Castiglia, Stefano F.
    Magnifica, Fabrizio
    MINERVA ORTHOPEDICS, 2023, 74 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [9] Turkish version of the Pet Bereavement Questionnaire: Validity, reliability and psychometric properties
    Yuksel, Ozge
    Apak, Bengisu
    Demirci, Oyku
    DEATH STUDIES, 2023, 47 (02) : 130 - 138
  • [10] Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People
    Schwertner, Debora Soccal
    Oliveira, Raul
    Ramos Marinho, Ana Paula
    Benetti, Magnus
    Beltrame, Thais Silva
    Capistrano, Renata
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2017, 30 (10): : 691 - 698