Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain: validity and reliability

被引:6
|
作者
Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian [1 ]
Fonseca, Carlos Luques [2 ]
da Silva Gruninger, Bruno Leonardo [3 ]
Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos UFSCar, Phys Therapy Dept, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fac Anhanguera, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
[3] Fac Sudoeste Paulista, Itapetininga, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Paulista, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Surveys and questionnaires; Outcome assessment; Patient-reported outcome measures; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility; Physical therapy; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE; PORTUGUESE VERSION; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; TRANSLATION; DISABILITY; INDEX; VALIDATION; LANGUAGE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.02.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The Bournemouth Questionnaire is a comprehensive and short form multidimensional instrument developed to evaluate the health status of individuals with low back pain. The objective of this study was to verify the construct validity and the test-retest reliability of the Brazilian version of Bournemouth Questionnaire in individuals with low back pain. Methods: This is a methodological study that included 65 patients with low back pain. The Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was applied twice, and the test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and internal consistency. The construct validity of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and also with the following questionnaires: Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results: The total score of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire showed ICC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90), Cronbach's alpha of 0.85, SEM of 5.97, and MDC of 15.54, without evidence of ceiling and floor effects. The total score of the Brazilian Bournemouth Questionnaire was correlated to the NPRS for current (r = 0.64), highest (r = 0.49), and lowest (r = 0.67) pain as well as scores on the RMDQ (r = 0.58), ODI (r = 0.42), and SF-36 (r = -0.58). Conclusion: The total score of the Brazilian version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable to be used with patients with low back pain. (C) 2020 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 77
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Yao, Min
    Li, Zhen-jun
    Zhu, Sen
    Wang, Jun-yan
    Pan, Yan-fang
    Tian, Zi-rui
    Shen, Li-yang
    Cheng, Shao-dan
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) : E357 - E364
  • [42] Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the neuropathic pain questionnaire
    Shafiee, Erfan
    Farzad, Maryam
    Khodabandeh, Behzad
    Beigy, Amirreza Smaeil
    Backonja, Miroslav
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (20) : 6065 - 6069
  • [43] Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain
    R. Hilfiker
    I. A. Knutti
    B. Raval-Roland
    G. Rivier
    G. Crombez
    Emmanuelle Opsommer
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 2741 - 2749
  • [44] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE PELVIC PAIN IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE
    Kurt, Tugce Keziban
    Taspinar, Betul
    Taspinar, Ferruh
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 7 (02): : 705 - 712
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
    Bernini, O.
    Berrocal, C.
    Pennato, T.
    Guazzelli, M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2008, 23 : 66 - 66
  • [46] Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Personal Experience Screening Questionnaire
    Fidalgo, Thiago Marques
    da Silveira, Evelyn Doering
    Winters, Ken C.
    da Silveira, Dartiu Xavier
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 62 (08): : 768 - 773
  • [47] Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Wound Quality of Life questionnaire
    Vogt, Tatiele Naiara
    Santos, Pamella Naiana Dias
    Mantovani, Maria de Fatima
    Tomim, Dabna Hellen
    Guimaraes, Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt
    Kalinke, Luciana Puchalski
    REV RENE, 2020, 21
  • [48] Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
    Schafer, Julia Luiza
    Cibils Filho, Bolivar Ramos
    de Moura, Tayse Conter
    Tavares, Valquiria Coutinho
    Arteche, Adriane Xavier
    Kristensen, Christian Haag
    TRENDS IN PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 40 (02) : 160 - 169
  • [49] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BRAZILIAN VERSION OF THE SPORT IMAGERY ABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
    Filgueiras, Alberto
    Pieri, Rodrigo
    Pesca, Andrea
    Camilo, Juliana
    Melo, Gislane
    Galvao, Bruno de Oliveira
    Quintas Conde, Erick Francisco
    Landeira-Fernandez, J.
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL EJERCICIO Y EL DEPORTE, 2020, 15 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [50] Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Baldoto Gava, Eveline Coutinho
    Mendes Miguel, Jose Augusto
    de Araujo, Adriana Monteiro
    de Oliveira, Branca Heloisa
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 71 (10) : 1762.e1 - 1762.e8