The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned

被引:8
|
作者
Co, Zoe [1 ]
Holmgren, A. Jay [2 ]
Classen, David C. [3 ]
Newmark, Lisa P. [4 ]
Seger, Diane L. [4 ]
Cole, Jessica M. [5 ]
Pon, Barbara [6 ]
Zimmer, Karen P. [7 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Clin & Qual Anal, Somerville, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[6] Collaborat Healthcare Patient Safety Org, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic health record; computerized physician order entry; ambulatory care; patient safety; quality of care; medication safety; medication reconciliation;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1722917
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD DATA AS A POPULATION HEALTH SURVEILLANCE TOOL
    Johnson, P. J.
    VanWormer, J. J.
    Winden, T. J.
    Britt, H. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 171 : S109 - S109
  • [42] Electronic Health Record as a Knowledge Management Tool in the Scope of Health
    Angel Montero, Miguel
    Prado, Susana
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT FOR HEALTH CARE PROCEDURES, 2009, 5626 : 152 - +
  • [43] The Development of a Highly Constrained Health Level 7 Implementation Guide to Facilitate Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Systems
    Sujansky, Walter V.
    Overhage, J. Marc
    Chang, Sophia
    Frohlich, Jonah
    Eaus, Samuel A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2009, 16 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [44] Sociotechnical Challenges of Developing an Interoperable Personal Health Record Lessons Learned
    Gaskin, G. L.
    Longhurst, C. A.
    Slayton, R.
    Das, A. K.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 2 (04): : 406 - 419
  • [45] Lessons Learned from a Health Record Bank Start-up
    Yasnoff, W. A.
    Shortliffe, E. H.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2014, 53 (02) : 66 - 72
  • [46] Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record Tool to Identify Echocardiograms That Do Not Change Clinical Care
    Leuchter, Richard K.
    Gulhar, Radhika
    Maynick, Jeff D.
    Dardick, Lawrence D.
    Vorobiof, Gabriel
    Tabibiazar, Ramin
    Yang, Robert M.
    Sarkisian, Catherine A.
    Woo, Hawkin E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2023, 36 (12) : 1329 - 1332
  • [47] Targets as a tool in health policy Part I: lessons learned
    van Herten, LM
    Gunning-Schepers, LJ
    HEALTH POLICY, 2000, 53 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [48] Implementing Electronic Health Records in Germany: Lessons (Yet to Be) Learned
    Schmitt, Tugce
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 23 (01):
  • [49] Doubling down: Lessons learned from building a new electronic health record as part of primary care practice redesign
    Schutzbank, Andrew
    Fernandopulle, Rushika
    HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2014, 2 (01): : 14 - 18
  • [50] Rigor in electronic health record knowledge representation: Lessons learned from a SNOMED CT clinical content encoding exercise
    Monsen, Karen A.
    Finn, Robert S.
    Fleming, Thea E.
    Garner, Erin J.
    LaValla, Amy J.
    Riemer, Judith G.
    INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, 2016, 41 (02): : 97 - 111