The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned

被引:8
|
作者
Co, Zoe [1 ]
Holmgren, A. Jay [2 ]
Classen, David C. [3 ]
Newmark, Lisa P. [4 ]
Seger, Diane L. [4 ]
Cole, Jessica M. [5 ]
Pon, Barbara [6 ]
Zimmer, Karen P. [7 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Clin & Qual Anal, Somerville, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[6] Collaborat Healthcare Patient Safety Org, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic health record; computerized physician order entry; ambulatory care; patient safety; quality of care; medication safety; medication reconciliation;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1722917
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transition to a new electronic health record and pediatric medication safety: lessons learned in pediatrics within a large academic health system
    Whalen, Kimberly
    Lynch, Emily
    Moawad, Iman
    John, Tanya
    Lozowski, Denise
    Cummings, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (07) : 848 - 854
  • [32] Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record
    McAlearney, Ann Scheck
    Hefner, Jennifer L.
    Sieck, Cynthia
    Rizer, Milisa
    Huerta, Timothy R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [33] Ambulatory physicians' electronic health record self-efficacy
    Hellems, Martha Ann
    JAMIA OPEN, 2021, 4 (03)
  • [34] ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD AMBULATORY TRAINING FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE INTERNS
    Ong, Shawn
    O'Shea, Jesse
    Rosenbaum, Julie R.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S697 - S698
  • [35] Multitasking and Silent Electronic Health Record Use in Ambulatory Visits
    Ratanawongsa, Neda
    Matta, George Y.
    Lyles, Courtney R.
    Koenig, Christopher J.
    Barton, Jennifer L.
    Yu, Kaylin
    Schillinger, Dean
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (09) : 1382 - 1385
  • [36] Electronic Prescribing Within an Electronic Health Record Reduces Ambulatory Prescribing Errors
    Abramson, Erika L.
    Barron, Yolanda
    Quaresimo, Jill
    Kaushal, Rainu
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2011, 37 (10): : 470 - 478
  • [37] Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record
    Pereira, Rui
    Duarte, Julio
    Salazar, Maria
    Santos, Manuel
    Neves, Jose
    Abelha, Antonio
    Machado, Jose
    2012 IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES (IECBES), 2012,
  • [38] Evaluation of electronic health record systems
    Nohr, C.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2006, 45 : 107 - 113
  • [39] Development of the electronic health record in Japan
    Yoshihara, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1998, 49 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [40] IMPLEMENTING PERSONALIZED MEDICINE IN AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD ENVIRONMENT: LESSONS BEING LEARNED
    Roden, Dan M.
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2014, 45 : 5 - 6