The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned

被引:8
|
作者
Co, Zoe [1 ]
Holmgren, A. Jay [2 ]
Classen, David C. [3 ]
Newmark, Lisa P. [4 ]
Seger, Diane L. [4 ]
Cole, Jessica M. [5 ]
Pon, Barbara [6 ]
Zimmer, Karen P. [7 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Sch Business, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Mass Gen Brigham, Clin & Qual Anal, Somerville, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Internal Med, Div Epidemiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[6] Collaborat Healthcare Patient Safety Org, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic health record; computerized physician order entry; ambulatory care; patient safety; quality of care; medication safety; medication reconciliation;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1722917
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Substantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed. Objective To outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot. Methods The Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists. Results For the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot. Conclusion Clinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record in a Health System Lessons Learned
    Maust, Dawn
    JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 28 (01) : E11 - E15
  • [2] Usability Testing an Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned and Ethical Considerations
    Fuller, Helen J. A.
    Maddox, Kyle D.
    Lightner, Nancy J.
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 482 : 425 - 432
  • [3] How Safe are Outpatient Electronic Health Records? An Evaluation of Medication-Related Decision Support using the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool
    Co, Zoe
    Classen, David C.
    Cole, Jessica M.
    Seger, Diane L.
    Madsen, Randy
    Davis, Terrance
    Mcgaffigan, Patricia
    Bates, David W.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 14 (05): : 981 - 991
  • [4] Interprofessional education: Lessons learned from conducting an electronic health record assignment
    Titzer, Jennifer L.
    Swenty, Constance F.
    Wilson, Gabriela Mustata
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2015, 29 (06) : 536 - 540
  • [5] An electronic health record system implementation in a resource limited country-lessons learned
    Ali, Sayed K.
    Khan, Haroon
    Shah, Jasmit
    Ahmed, K. Nadeem
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [6] Development and pilot evaluation of an electronic health record usability and safety self-assessment tool
    Pruitt, Zoe
    Howe, Jessica L.
    Krevat, Seth A.
    Khairat, Saif
    Ratwani, Raj M.
    JAMIA OPEN, 2022, 5 (03)
  • [7] Generative artificial intelligence responses to patient messages in the electronic health record: early lessons learned
    Baxter, Sally L.
    Longhurst, Christopher A.
    Millen, Marlene
    Sitapati, Amy M.
    Tai-Seale, Ming
    JAMIA OPEN, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [8] IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONWIDE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEM IN SERBIA: CHALLENGES, LESSONS LEARNED, AND EARLY OUTCOMES
    Vekic, Berislav
    Pilipovic, Filip
    Dragojevic-Simic, Viktorija
    Zivic, Rastko
    Radovanovic, Dragce
    Rancic, Nemanja
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2022, 61 (03) : 488 - 495
  • [9] Data Collection Using the Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned From the Chart Review Process
    Spratling, Regena
    Powers, Erin
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2015, 29 (03) : 294 - 296
  • [10] Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned
    Pfaff, Emily
    Lee, Adam
    Bradford, Robert
    Pae, Jinhee
    Potter, Clarence
    Blue, Paul
    Knoepp, Patricia
    Thompson, Kristie
    Roumie, Christianne L.
    Crenshaw, David
    Servis, Remy
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 26 (01) : 44 - 49