A closed-form expression for computing the sensitivity in second-order bilinear calibration

被引:65
|
作者
Olivieri, Alejandro C.
Faber, Nicolaas M.
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Rosario, Dept Quim Anal, Fac Ciencias Bioquim & Farmaceut, RA-2000 Rosario, Argentina
[2] Chemometry Consultancy, NL-6717 VD Ede, Netherlands
关键词
second-order bilinear calibration; sensitivity; net analyte signal; parallel factor analysis; bilinear least-squares;
D O I
10.1002/cem.964
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A general expression is derived for estimating the sensitivity of second-order bilinear calibration models, particularly parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and bilinear least-squares (BLLS), whether the second-order advantage is required or not. In the latter case, the sensitivity is correctly estimated either if the advantage is achieved by processing the unknown sample together with the calibration set (PARAFAC), or by post-calibration residual bilinearization (BLLS). The expression includes, as special cases, the sensitivity expressions already discussed by Messick, Kalivas and Lang (MKL) and by Ho, Christian and Davidson (HCD). The former one is the maximum achievable sensitivity in a given calibration situation, where all components are present in the calibration set of samples. The latter approach gives the lowest possible sensitivity, corresponding to only calibrating the analyte of interest, leaving the remaining components as uncalibrated constituents of the unknown sample. In intermediate situations, that is more than one calibrated analyte and presence of unexpected components in the unknown sample, only the present approach is able to provide a satisfactory sensitivity parameter, in close agreement with previously described Monte Carlo numerical simulations. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 592
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Closed-form solutions of second-order linear difference equations close to the self-adjoint Euler type
    Jekl, Jan
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 46 (05) : 5314 - 5327
  • [22] A Second-Order Closed-Form J2 Model for the Draper Semi-Analytical Satellite Theory
    San-Juan, Juan F.
    Lopez, Rosario
    Cefola, Paul J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 69 (05): : 1292 - 1318
  • [23] Second-Order Bilinear Discriminant Analysis
    Christoforou, Christoforos
    Haralick, Robert
    Sajda, Paul
    Parra, Lucas C.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2010, 11 : 665 - 685
  • [24] A Closed-Form Expression Relating Classification Accuracy to SAR System Calibration Uncertainty
    Davidson, Malcolm W. J.
    Attema, Evert
    Floury, Nicolas
    Rommen, Bjorn
    Snoeij, Paul
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2009, 6 (03) : 467 - 470
  • [25] Second-order universal calibration
    Ghaffari, Mandiyeh
    Khoshayand, Mohammad Reza
    Duponchel, Ludovic
    Abdollahi, Hamid
    TALANTA, 2020, 212
  • [26] Advances in second-order calibration
    Kowalski, Bruce R., 1600, John Wiley and Sons Ltd (07):
  • [27] Towards a Closed Form Second-Order Natural Scene Statistics Model
    Sinno, Zeina
    Caramanis, Constantine
    Bovik, Alan C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (07) : 3194 - 3209
  • [28] Achieving the analytical second-order advantage with non-bilinear second-order data
    Chiappini, Fabricio A.
    Gutierrez, Fabiana
    Goicoechea, Hector C.
    Olivieri, Alejandro C.
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 1181
  • [29] Closed Form Expressions of Balanced Realizations of Second-Order Analog Filters
    Yamaki, Shunsuke
    Abe, Masahide
    Kawamata, Masayuki
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2014, E97A (02) : 565 - 571
  • [30] Stabilisation of second-order bilinear and semilinear systems
    Ezzaki, Lahcen
    Zerrik, El Hassan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2021, 94 (12) : 3483 - 3490