Comparison of two moving target detector's performance

被引：0
|
作者：
Li, H
Chen, YH
Liu, H
机构：
来源：
ICSP '96 - 1996 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II | 1996年
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号：
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要：
This paper compares two kinds of moving target detector: AMTD-CFAR (Adaptive Moving Target Detection CFAR) and OS-CFAR detector. Their detection performance is investigated for different situation such as different distribution, uniform background, clutter edge and strong interference target. The results indicate that AMTD-CFAR detector has very small loss of CFAR, it's detection performance is better than that of OS-CFAR detector for different distribution, uniform background , especially in multiple-target environment.
引用
收藏
页码：867 / 870
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the synthesis of a moving target's positions
    An, Kai
    Ma, Jia-Guang
    Fu, Cheng-Yu
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24 (09):
  • [22] Performance Simulations of Moving Target Search Algorithms
    Loh, Peter K. K.
    Prakash, Edmond C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER GAMES TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 2009 (01)
  • [23] Moving target performance for RADARSAT-2
    Thompson, AA
    Livingstone, CE
    IGARSS 2000: IEEE 2000 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOL I - VI, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 2599 - 2601
  • [24] Performance evaluation of the CyberKnife system in real-time target tracking during beam delivery using a moving phantom coupled with two-dimensional detector array
    Yang, Bin
    Chiu, Tin Lok
    Law, Wai Kong
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Leung, Tat Ming
    Yiu, Lok Hang
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 12 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [25] Performance evaluation of the CyberKnife system in real-time target tracking during beam delivery using a moving phantom coupled with two-dimensional detector array
    Bin Yang
    Tin Lok Chiu
    Wai Kong Law
    Hui Geng
    Wai Wang Lam
    Tat Ming Leung
    Lok Hang Yiu
    Kin Yin Cheung
    Siu Ki Yu
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2019, 12 : 86 - 95
  • [26] Performance comparison of two signal multiplexing readouts for SiPM-based pet detector
    Yang, Qian
    Kuang, Zhonghua
    Sang, Ziru
    Yang, Yongfeng
    Du, Junwei
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (23):
  • [27] Performance Comparison of Motion Encoders: Hassenstein-Reichardt and Two-Detector Models
    Ikeda, Hideaki
    Aonishi, Toru
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICONIP 2017), PT III, 2017, 10636 : 885 - 893
  • [28] A performance comparison study between two HPGe lung counters with different detector configurations
    Naito, Masayuki
    Tamakuma, Yuki
    Mihei, Yuma
    Yajima, Kazuaki
    Tani, Kotaro
    Kim, Eunjoo
    Kowatari, Munehiko
    Kurihara, Osamu
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2024, 200 (15) : 1486 - 1491
  • [29] A TWO-STEP DETECTOR FOR DISTRIBUTED TARGET DETECTION
    Chen, Ning
    Liu, Jun
    2019 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ISSPIT 2019), 2019,
  • [30] Performance comparison of two compact multiplexed readouts with SensL's SPMArray4 for high-resolution detector module
    Qi, Yujin
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Zhao, Cuilan
    Chen, Lihong
    Petasecca, Macro
    Safavi-Naeini, Mitra
    Lerch, Micheal
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 455 - 457
12345