Do Pedagogical Agents Enhance Software Training?

被引:9
|
作者
van der Meij, Hans [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Instruct Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2013年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词
MOTIVATIONAL ELEMENTS; LEARNING COMPANIONS; SELF-EXPLANATION; INTERFACE AGENTS; USER FRUSTRATION; SOLVING PROBLEMS; STUDENTS LEARN; COGNITIVE LOAD; SOCIAL AGENCY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/07370024.2013.789348
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether a tutorial for software training can be enhanced by adding a pedagogical agent, and whether the type of agent matters (i.e., cognitive, motivational, or mixed). The cognitive agent was designed to stimulate students to process their experiences actively. The motivational agent was designed to increase perceived task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs. A mixed agent combined these features. Process and product data were recorded during and after software training of students from the upper grades of vocational education (M age = 16.2 years). Comparison of scores on performance measures during training revealed a significant advantage of working with the motivational and mixed agents for two important motivational mediators for learning (i.e., strategy systematicity and mood). All students were highly successful during training, improving from an average 30% task completion score on the pretest to a 77% posttest score. On a retention measure 3 weeks later, task completion was still at 66%. Working with the motivational and control agents yielded significantly higher retention scores, whereas working with the motivational and mixed agents led to significantly higher scores on task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs after training. The discussion reflects on the possibilities for improving the internal and external properties of the agents.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 547
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feedback source modality effects on training outcomes in a serious game: Pedagogical agents make a difference
    Goldberg, Benjamin
    Cannon-Bowers, Janis
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 52 : 1 - 11
  • [32] Leucine Metabolites Do Not Enhance Training-induced Performance or Muscle Thickness
    Tedceira, Filipe J.
    Matias, Catarina N.
    Monteiro, Cristina P.
    Valamatos, Maria J.
    Reis, Joana F.
    Tavares, Francisco
    Batista, Ana
    Domingos, Christophe
    Alves, Francisco
    Sardinha, Luis B.
    Phillips, Stuart M.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (01): : 56 - 64
  • [33] Pedagogical Training of Medicine Professors
    da Silva Campos Costa, Nilce Maria
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2010, 18 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [34] The pedagogical and didactic training of librarians
    Avellino, Andrea
    AIB STUDI, 2024, 64 (02): : 249 - 260
  • [35] Pedagogical models in teacher training
    Loya Chavez, Hermila
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION, 2008, 46 (03):
  • [36] PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE IN TEACHER TRAINING
    Patino Garzon, Luceli
    REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2010, 2 (01):
  • [37] Teacher training and pedagogical methods
    Stone, JE
    TEACHER QUALITY, 2002, (505): : 33 - 54
  • [38] Pedagogical Training of University Lecturers
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING (ICL), 2014, : 479 - 479
  • [39] THE INTENSIFICATION OF POSTGRADUTE PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING
    Kotlyarova, Irina
    Serikov, Gennadii
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2017 (ERIE), 2017, : 168 - 175
  • [40] Building software agents for training systems: A case study on radiotherapy treatment planning
    Farias, A
    Arvanitis, TN
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1997, 10 (03) : 161 - 168