Do Pedagogical Agents Enhance Software Training?

被引:9
|
作者
van der Meij, Hans [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Instruct Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2013年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词
MOTIVATIONAL ELEMENTS; LEARNING COMPANIONS; SELF-EXPLANATION; INTERFACE AGENTS; USER FRUSTRATION; SOLVING PROBLEMS; STUDENTS LEARN; COGNITIVE LOAD; SOCIAL AGENCY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/07370024.2013.789348
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether a tutorial for software training can be enhanced by adding a pedagogical agent, and whether the type of agent matters (i.e., cognitive, motivational, or mixed). The cognitive agent was designed to stimulate students to process their experiences actively. The motivational agent was designed to increase perceived task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs. A mixed agent combined these features. Process and product data were recorded during and after software training of students from the upper grades of vocational education (M age = 16.2 years). Comparison of scores on performance measures during training revealed a significant advantage of working with the motivational and mixed agents for two important motivational mediators for learning (i.e., strategy systematicity and mood). All students were highly successful during training, improving from an average 30% task completion score on the pretest to a 77% posttest score. On a retention measure 3 weeks later, task completion was still at 66%. Working with the motivational and control agents yielded significantly higher retention scores, whereas working with the motivational and mixed agents led to significantly higher scores on task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs after training. The discussion reflects on the possibilities for improving the internal and external properties of the agents.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 547
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] SOFTWARE VISUALIZATION AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL
    EISENSTADT, M
    PRICE, BA
    DOMINGUE, J
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1992, 21 (05) : 335 - 364
  • [23] End-user software training: an experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation
    Olfman, L.
    Bostrom, R. P.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 1991, 1 (04) : 249 - 266
  • [24] How to Enhance the Status of the Pedagogical Worker
    Tikhonov, M. Iu
    RUSSIAN EDUCATION AND SOCIETY, 2011, 53 (11): : 3 - 9
  • [25] Pedagogical Agents: Back to the Future
    Johnson, W. Lewis
    Lester, James C.
    AI MAGAZINE, 2018, 39 (02) : 33 - 44
  • [26] Explainability in Autonomous Pedagogical Agents
    Tulli, Silvia
    THIRTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THE THIRTY-SECOND INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE AND THE TENTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 34 : 13738 - 13739
  • [27] Learner Perception of Pedagogical Agents
    Beukman, Marei
    Chen, Xiaobin
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION. POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2023, 2023, 1831 : 587 - 592
  • [28] Architectural patterns in pedagogical agents
    Devedzic, V
    Harrer, A
    INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, 2002, 2363 : 81 - 90
  • [29] Designing pedagogical agents for CSCL
    Baggetun, R
    Dragsnes, S
    DESIGNING FOR CHANGE IN NETWORKED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2003, 2 : 151 - 155
  • [30] DO BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR BLOCKING-AGENTS ENHANCE BUPIVACAINE CARDIOTOXICITY
    DELACOUSSAYE, JE
    ELEDJAM, JJ
    BRUGADA, J
    BASSOUL, B
    GAGNOL, JP
    DESCH, G
    DATHIS, F
    SASSINE, A
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1990, 9 (02): : 132 - 136