Do Pedagogical Agents Enhance Software Training?

被引:9
|
作者
van der Meij, Hans [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Instruct Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION | 2013年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词
MOTIVATIONAL ELEMENTS; LEARNING COMPANIONS; SELF-EXPLANATION; INTERFACE AGENTS; USER FRUSTRATION; SOLVING PROBLEMS; STUDENTS LEARN; COGNITIVE LOAD; SOCIAL AGENCY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/07370024.2013.789348
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether a tutorial for software training can be enhanced by adding a pedagogical agent, and whether the type of agent matters (i.e., cognitive, motivational, or mixed). The cognitive agent was designed to stimulate students to process their experiences actively. The motivational agent was designed to increase perceived task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs. A mixed agent combined these features. Process and product data were recorded during and after software training of students from the upper grades of vocational education (M age = 16.2 years). Comparison of scores on performance measures during training revealed a significant advantage of working with the motivational and mixed agents for two important motivational mediators for learning (i.e., strategy systematicity and mood). All students were highly successful during training, improving from an average 30% task completion score on the pretest to a 77% posttest score. On a retention measure 3 weeks later, task completion was still at 66%. Working with the motivational and control agents yielded significantly higher retention scores, whereas working with the motivational and mixed agents led to significantly higher scores on task relevance and self-efficacy beliefs after training. The discussion reflects on the possibilities for improving the internal and external properties of the agents.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 547
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pedagogical agents in virtual team training
    Johnson, WL
    Marsella, S
    Rickel, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VIRTUAL WORLDS AND SIMULATION CONFERENCE (VWSIM'98), 1998, 30 (02): : 72 - 77
  • [2] What Do Children Favor as Embodied Pedagogical Agents?
    Girard, Sylvie
    Johnson, Hilary
    INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6094 : 307 - 316
  • [3] Pedagogical virtual agents to support training of human groups
    Aguilar, Raul A.
    de Antonio, Angelica
    Imbert, Ricardo
    CERMA2006: ELECTRONICS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICS CONFERENCE, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 149 - 154
  • [4] Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning?
    Heidig, Steffi
    Clarebout, Geraldine
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2011, 6 (01) : 27 - 54
  • [5] Assessing the Social Agency of Pedagogical Agents in Adaptive Training Systems
    Schroeder, Bradford L.
    Fraulini, Nicholas W.
    Van Buskirk, Wendi L.
    Miller, Reganne M.
    ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS, AIS 2022, 2022, 13332 : 302 - 313
  • [6] TRAINING AGENTS TO DO EFFECTIVE TEACHING
    BURTNER, RH
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1967, 46 (05) : 1240 - &
  • [7] Animated pedagogical agents enhance learning outcomes and brain activity during learning
    Li, Wenjing
    Wang, Fuxing
    Mayer, Richard E.
    Liu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (03) : 621 - 637
  • [8] Using Software Agents to Enhance the Functionality of Social Knowledge Portal
    Zytniewski, Mariusz
    Kowal, Radoslaw
    BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS, BIS 2013, 2013, 160 : 23 - 34
  • [9] Modern software and physical education: can online training enhance gym training?
    Ge, Linna
    Li, Menglu
    Ning, Changfeng
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)