Quantifying mammal biodiversity co-benefits in certified tropical forests

被引:43
|
作者
Sollmann, Rahel [1 ,2 ]
Mohamed, Azlan [2 ]
Niedballa, Jurgen [2 ]
Bender, Johannes [2 ]
Ambu, Laurentius [3 ]
Lagan, Peter [4 ]
Mannan, Sam [4 ]
Ong, Robert C. [5 ]
Langner, Andreas [6 ]
Gardner, Beth [1 ,7 ]
Wilting, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC USA
[2] Leibniz Inst Zoo & Wildlife Res, Alfred Kowalke Str 17, D-10315 Berlin, Germany
[3] Wisma MUIS, Sabah Wildlife Dept, 5th Floor,B Block, Kota Kinabalu 88100, Sabah, Malaysia
[4] Sabah Forestry Dept, Locked Bag 68, Sandakan 90009, Sabah, Malaysia
[5] Forest Res Ctr, Sabah Forestry Dept, POB 1407, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
[6] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[7] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Borneo; carbon payment; community occupancy model; forest stewardship council; REDD; Southeast Asia; sustainable forestry; ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY; CARBON PAYMENTS; CAMERA-TRAP; DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; DENSITY; IMPACT; SABAH; AGRICULTURE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12530
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Financial incentives to manage forests sustainably, such as certification or carbon storage payments, are assumed to have co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. This claim remains little studied for rain forest mammals, which are particularly threatened, but challenging to survey. Location Sabah, Malaysia, Borneo. Methods We used photographic data from three commercial forest reserves to show how community occupancy modelling can be used to quantify mammalian diversity conservation co-benefits of forest certification. These reserves had different management histories, and one was certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. Results Many threatened species occupied larger areas in the certified reserve. Species richness, estimated per 200x200-m grid cell throughout all reserves, was higher in the certified site, particularly for threatened species. The certified reserve held the highest aboveground biomass. Within reserves, aboveground biomass was not strongly correlated with patterns of mammal richness (Spearman's rho from 0.03 to 0.32); discrepancies were strongest along reserve borders. Main conclusions Our approach provides a flexible and standardized tool to assess biodiversity and identify winners of sustainable forestry. Inferring patterns of species richness from camera-trapping carries potential for the objective designation of high conservation value forest. Correlating species richness with aboveground biomass further allows evaluating the biodiversity co-benefits of carbon protection. These advantages make the present approach an ideal tool to overcome the difficulties to rigorously quantify biodiversity co-benefits of forest certification and carbon storage payments.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 328
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Toward the quantification of the climate co-benefits of invasive mammal eradication on islands: a scalable framework for restoration monitoring
    Honzak, Miroslav
    Roberts, Geoffrey
    Cosentino, Bradley J.
    Sexton, Joseph O.
    McKenzie-McHarg, Harrison
    Wilson, John W.
    Feng, Min
    Thieme, Alison
    Hunka, Neha
    Will, David J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [42] Diffuse Load Abatement with Biodiversity Co-Benefits: The Optimal Rotation Age and Buffer Zone Size
    Miettinen, Jenni
    Ollikainen, Markku
    Finer, Leena
    Koivusalo, Harri
    Lauren, Ari
    Valsta, Lauri
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (04) : 342 - 352
  • [43] Understanding the Roles of Biodiversity and Functional Diversity in Provision of Co-Benefits by Stormwater Biofilter Plant Communities
    Winfrey, B. K.
    Payne, E. G., I
    Ambrose, R. F.
    INTERNATIONAL LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE 2018: GETTING IN TUNE WITH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, 2018, : 203 - 212
  • [44] Better biodiversity accounting is needed to prevent bioperversity and maximize co-benefits from savanna burning
    Corey, Ben
    Andersen, Alan N.
    Legge, Sarah
    Woinarski, John C. Z.
    Radford, Ian J.
    Perry, Justin J.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2020, 13 (01):
  • [45] Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 1 - 9
  • [46] Quantifying co-benefits of water quality policies: An integrated assessment model of land and nitrogen management
    Weng, Weizhe
    Cobourn, Kelly M. M.
    Kemanian, Armen R. R.
    Boyle, Kevin J. J.
    Shi, Yuning
    Stachelek, Jemma
    White, Charles
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 106 (02) : 547 - 572
  • [47] Energy security assessment methods: Quantifying the security co-benefits of decarbonising the Irish Energy System
    Glynn, James
    Chiodi, Alessandro
    Gallachoir, Brian O.
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2017, 15 : 72 - 88
  • [48] Quantifying co-benefits and disbenefits of Nature-based Solutions targeting Disaster Risk Reduction
    Ommer, Joy
    Bucchignani, Edoardo
    Leo, Laura S.
    Kalas, Milan
    Vranic, Sasa
    Debele, Sisay
    Kumar, Prashant
    Cloke, Hannah L.
    Di Sabatino, Silvana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 75
  • [49] Quantifying air quality co-benefits to industrial decarbonization: the local Air Emissions Tracking Atlas
    Jordan, Amy B.
    Rodriguez, Daniel S.
    Bennett, Jeffrey A.
    Sale, Kat
    Gilhooley, Christopher
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [50] Co-benefits and 'no regrets' benefits of influenza pandemic planning
    Wilson, Nick
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    Baker, Michael G.
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2010, 4 (03) : 113 - 115