Quantifying mammal biodiversity co-benefits in certified tropical forests

被引:43
|
作者
Sollmann, Rahel [1 ,2 ]
Mohamed, Azlan [2 ]
Niedballa, Jurgen [2 ]
Bender, Johannes [2 ]
Ambu, Laurentius [3 ]
Lagan, Peter [4 ]
Mannan, Sam [4 ]
Ong, Robert C. [5 ]
Langner, Andreas [6 ]
Gardner, Beth [1 ,7 ]
Wilting, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC USA
[2] Leibniz Inst Zoo & Wildlife Res, Alfred Kowalke Str 17, D-10315 Berlin, Germany
[3] Wisma MUIS, Sabah Wildlife Dept, 5th Floor,B Block, Kota Kinabalu 88100, Sabah, Malaysia
[4] Sabah Forestry Dept, Locked Bag 68, Sandakan 90009, Sabah, Malaysia
[5] Forest Res Ctr, Sabah Forestry Dept, POB 1407, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
[6] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[7] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Borneo; carbon payment; community occupancy model; forest stewardship council; REDD; Southeast Asia; sustainable forestry; ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY; CARBON PAYMENTS; CAMERA-TRAP; DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; DENSITY; IMPACT; SABAH; AGRICULTURE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12530
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Financial incentives to manage forests sustainably, such as certification or carbon storage payments, are assumed to have co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. This claim remains little studied for rain forest mammals, which are particularly threatened, but challenging to survey. Location Sabah, Malaysia, Borneo. Methods We used photographic data from three commercial forest reserves to show how community occupancy modelling can be used to quantify mammalian diversity conservation co-benefits of forest certification. These reserves had different management histories, and one was certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. Results Many threatened species occupied larger areas in the certified reserve. Species richness, estimated per 200x200-m grid cell throughout all reserves, was higher in the certified site, particularly for threatened species. The certified reserve held the highest aboveground biomass. Within reserves, aboveground biomass was not strongly correlated with patterns of mammal richness (Spearman's rho from 0.03 to 0.32); discrepancies were strongest along reserve borders. Main conclusions Our approach provides a flexible and standardized tool to assess biodiversity and identify winners of sustainable forestry. Inferring patterns of species richness from camera-trapping carries potential for the objective designation of high conservation value forest. Correlating species richness with aboveground biomass further allows evaluating the biodiversity co-benefits of carbon protection. These advantages make the present approach an ideal tool to overcome the difficulties to rigorously quantify biodiversity co-benefits of forest certification and carbon storage payments.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 328
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions
    Vandyck, Toon
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Tchung-Ming, Stephane
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1501 - 1517
  • [32] Biodiversity, war, and tropical forests
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    2003, Haworth Press Inc. (16) : 3 - 4
  • [33] Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon
    Mikolas, Martin
    Svitok, Marek
    Bace, Radek
    Meigs, Garrett W.
    Keeton, William S.
    Keith, Heather
    Buechling, Arne
    Trotsiuk, Volodymyr
    Kozak, Daniel
    Bollmann, Kurt
    Begovic, Kresimir
    Cada, Vojtech
    Chaskovskyy, Oleh
    Ralhan, Dheeraj
    Dusatko, Martin
    Ferencik, Matej
    Frankovic, Michal
    Gloor, Rhiannon
    Hofmeister, Jenyk
    Janda, Pavel
    Kameniar, Ondrej
    Labusova, Jana
    Majdanova, Linda
    Nagel, Thomas A.
    Pavlin, Jakob
    Pettit, Joseph L.
    Rodrigo, Ruffy
    Roibu, Catalin-Constantin
    Rydval, Milos
    Sabatini, Francesco M.
    Schurman, Jonathan
    Synek, Michal
    Vostarek, Ondrej
    Zemlerova, Veronika
    Svoboda, Miroslav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 288 (1961)
  • [34] Co-benefits of biomass and biodiversity in a protected mountain forest of West Java']Java, Indonesia
    Rozak, Andes Hamuraby
    Kusuma, Yayan Wahyu Candra
    Junaedi, Decky Indrawan
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2023, 16 : 62 - 69
  • [35] Co-benefits towards commitments
    不详
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 7 (07) : 955 - 955
  • [36] Co-benefits towards commitments
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 955 - 955
  • [37] Integrating sustainability into climate finance by quantifying the co-benefits and market impact of carbon projects
    Lou, Jiehong
    Hultman, Nathan
    Patwardhan, Anand
    Qiu, Yueming Lucy
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [38] Integrating sustainability into climate finance by quantifying the co-benefits and market impact of carbon projects
    Jiehong Lou
    Nathan Hultman
    Anand Patwardhan
    Yueming Lucy Qiu
    Communications Earth & Environment, 3
  • [39] Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China's steel sector: An integrated assessment approach
    Ma, Ding
    Chen, Wenying
    Yin, Xiang
    Wang, Lining
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 162 : 1225 - 1237
  • [40] Quantifying the emissions and air quality co-benefits of lower-carbon electricity production
    Plachinski, Steven D.
    Holloway, Tracey
    Meier, Paul J.
    Nemet, Gregory F.
    Rrushaj, Arber
    Oberman, Jacob T.
    Duran, Phillip L.
    Voigt, Caitlin L.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 94 : 180 - 191