Vesicourethral anastomosis biopsy after radical prostatectomy: Predictive value of prostate-specific antigen and pathologic stage

被引:55
|
作者
Shekarriz, B
Upadhyay, J
Wood, DP
Hinman, J
Raasch, J
Cummings, GD
Grignon, D
Littrup, PJ
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[5] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00351-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the role of clinical parameters and pathologic stage in predicting a positive vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) biopsy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy. Methods. Forty-five patients were referred for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy. Transrectal ultrasound evaluation included visualization of the VUA and VUA quadrant biopsies. The rate of positive biopsies (per core and per patient) was correlated with race, PSA level, and the radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Results. Overall, 53% of patients had a positive biopsy. In multivariate analysis, the dominant independent and synergistic clinical parameters determining positive biopsy rates were a PSA greater than 1 ng/mL at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). Using a PSA cutoff point of 1.0 ng/mL, those patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less showed no positive cancer cores (low-risk group). Conversely, 89% of patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL had a positive biopsy (P <0.01) (high-risk group). Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension and a PSA 1.0 ng/mL or less (intermediate-risk group) had a significantly higher chance of having residual cancer than the low-risk group (P <0.025). Conclusions, The PSA level at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage of the radical prostatectomy specimen were the strongest determinants of a positive biopsy. A combination of PSA and pathologic stage is useful for decisions regarding VUA biopsy. Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less do not appear to benefit from a VUA biopsy, and patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL have such a high probability (89%) of local recurrence at the VUA that biopsy may be unnecessary. It appears that VUA biopsy can be restricted to those patients with an intermediate risk (organ-confined disease with PSA greater than 1 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension with a PSA less than ng/mL). (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1048
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy for Patients Treated in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Bianco, Fernando J., Jr.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Wood, David P.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (26) : 4300 - 4305
  • [32] Timing of Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir After Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence
    Skove, Stephanie L.
    Howard, Lauren E.
    Aronson, William J.
    Terris, Martha K.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 108 : 129 - 134
  • [33] OPTIMAL TIMING OF HORMONAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Matsumoto, Kazuhiro
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Tanaka, Nobuyuki
    Ide, Hiroki
    Hasegawa, Masanori
    Ishida, Masaru
    Hayakawa, Nozomi
    Yasumizu, Yota
    Hagiwara, Masayuki
    Hara, Satoshi
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Miyajima, Akira
    Nakagawa, Ken
    Nakajima, Yosuke
    Nakamura, So
    Nakashima, Jun
    Oya, Mototsugu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E807 - E807
  • [34] Prognostic Implications of an Undetectable Ultrasensitive Prostate-Specific Antigen Level after Radical Prostatectomy
    Eisenberg, Michael L.
    Davies, Benjamin J.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (04) : 622 - 629
  • [35] Prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy versus brachytherapy -: Reply by the authors
    Walsh, PC
    UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (04) : 866 - 866
  • [36] Maximum Tumor Diameter and the Risk of Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Rose, Brent S.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Zhang, Danjie
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Chang, Stephen L.
    Hegde, John V.
    Loffredo, Marian J.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2014, 12 (05) : E173 - E179
  • [37] Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Impact on Oncologic Outcomes
    Preisser, Felix
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Pompe, Raisa S.
    Heinze, Alexander
    Salomon, Georg
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Tilki, Derya
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [38] RADIOTHERAPY FOR ISOLATED INCREASES IN SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    SCHILD, SE
    WONG, WW
    GRADO, GL
    BUSKIRK, SJ
    ROBINOW, JS
    FRICK, LM
    FERRIGNI, RG
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 69 (07) : 613 - 619
  • [39] Several Questions About Prostate-Specific Antigen and Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy
    Mai, Zhipeng
    Yan, Weigang
    Zhou, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (23) : 3956 - +
  • [40] THE INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DETECTABLE LEVELS OF SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    TRAPASSO, JG
    DEKERNION, JB
    SMITH, RB
    DOREY, F
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05): : 1821 - 1825