Vesicourethral anastomosis biopsy after radical prostatectomy: Predictive value of prostate-specific antigen and pathologic stage

被引:55
|
作者
Shekarriz, B
Upadhyay, J
Wood, DP
Hinman, J
Raasch, J
Cummings, GD
Grignon, D
Littrup, PJ
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[5] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00351-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the role of clinical parameters and pathologic stage in predicting a positive vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) biopsy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy. Methods. Forty-five patients were referred for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy. Transrectal ultrasound evaluation included visualization of the VUA and VUA quadrant biopsies. The rate of positive biopsies (per core and per patient) was correlated with race, PSA level, and the radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Results. Overall, 53% of patients had a positive biopsy. In multivariate analysis, the dominant independent and synergistic clinical parameters determining positive biopsy rates were a PSA greater than 1 ng/mL at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). Using a PSA cutoff point of 1.0 ng/mL, those patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less showed no positive cancer cores (low-risk group). Conversely, 89% of patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL had a positive biopsy (P <0.01) (high-risk group). Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension and a PSA 1.0 ng/mL or less (intermediate-risk group) had a significantly higher chance of having residual cancer than the low-risk group (P <0.025). Conclusions, The PSA level at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage of the radical prostatectomy specimen were the strongest determinants of a positive biopsy. A combination of PSA and pathologic stage is useful for decisions regarding VUA biopsy. Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less do not appear to benefit from a VUA biopsy, and patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL have such a high probability (89%) of local recurrence at the VUA that biopsy may be unnecessary. It appears that VUA biopsy can be restricted to those patients with an intermediate risk (organ-confined disease with PSA greater than 1 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension with a PSA less than ng/mL). (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1048
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Elimination of serum complexed prostate-specific antigen after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Stephan, C
    Jung, K
    Brux, B
    Lein, M
    Sinha, P
    Schnorr, D
    Leoning, SA
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2000, 38 (04) : 309 - 311
  • [22] Complexed prostate-specific antigen for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    Partin, Alan W.
    Trock, Bruce
    Bruzek, Debra J.
    Cheli, Carol
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (04) : 758 - 761
  • [23] Clinicopathologic Analysis of Vesicourethral Anastomosis Biopsy after Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Systemic Progression
    Reynolds, J. P.
    Cheville, J. C.
    Karnes, R. J.
    Jimenez, R. E.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 214A - 214A
  • [24] Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Kupelian, P
    Katcher, J
    Levin, H
    Zippe, C
    Klein, E
    UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) : 249 - 260
  • [25] Salvage radiotherapy in patients with persisting prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Bottke, D
    Wiegel, T
    Höcht, S
    Müller, M
    Schostak, M
    Hinkelbein, W
    ONCOLOGY, 2003, 65 : 18 - 23
  • [26] Time trends in case selection, stage and prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multicentre audit
    Winkler, MH
    Khan, FA
    Hoh, IM
    Okeke, AA
    Sugiono, M
    McInerney, P
    Boustead, GB
    Persad, R
    Kaisary, AV
    Gillatt, DA
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (06) : 725 - 729
  • [27] Evaluation and management of prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
    Naito, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 35 (07) : 365 - 374
  • [28] Prostate cancer laterality does not predict prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Sun, Leon
    Madden, John F.
    Mayes, Janice M.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (06) : 1141 - 1145
  • [29] The Impact of the Percent of Residual Prostate-Specific Antigen on Metastasis-Free Survival in Patients with Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen after Radical Prostatectomy
    Lee, Dan Bee
    Kim, Jae Yeon
    Song, Won Hoon
    Nam, Jong Kil
    Lee, Hyun Jung
    Kim, Tae Un
    Park, Sung-Woo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2023, 41 (01): : 227 - 235
  • [30] Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Bianco, Fernando J.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 649 - 649