Vesicourethral anastomosis biopsy after radical prostatectomy: Predictive value of prostate-specific antigen and pathologic stage

被引:55
|
作者
Shekarriz, B
Upadhyay, J
Wood, DP
Hinman, J
Raasch, J
Cummings, GD
Grignon, D
Littrup, PJ
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[5] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00351-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the role of clinical parameters and pathologic stage in predicting a positive vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) biopsy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy. Methods. Forty-five patients were referred for a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy. Transrectal ultrasound evaluation included visualization of the VUA and VUA quadrant biopsies. The rate of positive biopsies (per core and per patient) was correlated with race, PSA level, and the radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Results. Overall, 53% of patients had a positive biopsy. In multivariate analysis, the dominant independent and synergistic clinical parameters determining positive biopsy rates were a PSA greater than 1 ng/mL at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). Using a PSA cutoff point of 1.0 ng/mL, those patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less showed no positive cancer cores (low-risk group). Conversely, 89% of patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL had a positive biopsy (P <0.01) (high-risk group). Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension and a PSA 1.0 ng/mL or less (intermediate-risk group) had a significantly higher chance of having residual cancer than the low-risk group (P <0.025). Conclusions, The PSA level at the time of biopsy and the pathologic stage of the radical prostatectomy specimen were the strongest determinants of a positive biopsy. A combination of PSA and pathologic stage is useful for decisions regarding VUA biopsy. Patients with organ-confined disease and a PSA of 1.0 ng/mL or less do not appear to benefit from a VUA biopsy, and patients with extraprostatic extension and a PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL have such a high probability (89%) of local recurrence at the VUA that biopsy may be unnecessary. It appears that VUA biopsy can be restricted to those patients with an intermediate risk (organ-confined disease with PSA greater than 1 ng/mL or extraprostatic extension with a PSA less than ng/mL). (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1048
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Antebie, Elie
    Walz, Jochen
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Salonia, Andrea
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Saad, Fred
    Huland, Hartwig
    Montotsi, Francesco
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (04) : 1067 - 1075
  • [2] PREOPERATIVE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE AND GRADE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    WINTER, HI
    BRETTON, PR
    HERR, HW
    UROLOGY, 1991, 38 (03) : 202 - 205
  • [3] Artificial Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Poyet, Cedric
    Hof, Danielle
    Sulser, Tullio
    Muentener, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (05) : E62 - E63
  • [4] URINARY PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    TAKAYAMA, TK
    VESSELLA, RL
    BRAWER, MK
    TRUE, LD
    NOTEBOOM, J
    LANGE, PH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01): : 82 - 87
  • [5] Stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy
    Beck, V.
    Apfelbeck, M.
    Chaloupka, M.
    Kretschmer, A.
    Strittmatter, F.
    Tritschler, S.
    UROLOGE, 2018, 57 (01): : 29 - 33
  • [6] Surgery confounds biology: the predictive value of stage-, grade- and prostate-specific antigen for recurrence after radical prostatectomy as a function of surgeon experience
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Savage, Caroline J.
    Bianco, Fernando J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Secin, Fernando P.
    Guilloneau, Bertrand D.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 128 (07) : 1697 - 1702
  • [7] Management of patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy
    Laufer, M
    Pound, CR
    Carducci, MA
    Eisenberger, MA
    UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [8] Management of patients with an increasing prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy
    Khan M.A.
    Partin A.W.
    Current Urology Reports, 2004, 5 (3) : 179 - 187
  • [9] Predictors of Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen Persistence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Guo, Chenhao
    Zuo, Kangwei
    Zhao, Qi
    Zhang, Yongjuan
    Jiang, Nan
    Jing, Suoshi
    Yang, Qiaokai
    Li, Xiumei
    Shang, Panfeng
    Li, Weiping
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024,
  • [10] Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate-specific antigen elevation
    Wiegel, T
    Hinkelbein, W
    CONTROVERSIES IN URO-ONCOLOGY, 2002, 36 : 35 - 42