An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences

被引:89
|
作者
Koutsos, Thomas M. [1 ]
Menexes, Georgios C. [1 ]
Dordas, Christos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hellas, Sch Agr, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Agricultural research; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; METAANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY; TRIALS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Systematic review has generally been accepted as an effective, more complete, repeatable, and less biased type literature review that can successfully lead to evidence-based conclusions. This study attempts to develop a framework for systematic review with guidelines on how to conduct an effective systematic review for agricultural research. Systematic reviews require more time and effort but they can be used to conduct a comprehensive literature review, identifying potentially eligible articles on primary agricultural research and answering certain focused questions. A systematic review is also conducted as an example to examine whether systematic reviews are used in agricultural sciences. It was found that in the last two decades about a third (N = 29 out of 89 or 32.5%) of the eligible studies, classified as reviews related to agricultural research, are available as free full-text from publisher, while only eighteen of them were finally eligible to be included in this systematic review. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews
    Templier, Mathieu
    Paré, Guy
    Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2015, 37 : 112 - 137
  • [42] A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews
    Templier, Mathieu
    Pare, Guy
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 37 : 112 - 137
  • [43] Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Framework for Systematic Literature Reviews
    Le Dinh, Thang
    Le, Tran Duc
    Uwizeyemungu, Sylvestre
    Pelletier, Claudia
    Information (Switzerland), 2025, 16 (03)
  • [44] Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper
    Warren, T
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2006, 53 (01) : 102 - 104
  • [45] Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews
    Chen, Der-Thanq Victor
    Wang, Yu-Mei
    Lee, Wei Ching
    STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2016, 38 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [46] Conducting Systematic Reviews of Intervention Questions I: Writing the Review Protocol, Formulating the Question and Searching the Literature
    O'Connor, A. M.
    Anderson, K. M.
    Goodell, C. K.
    Sargeant, J. M.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 61 : 28 - 38
  • [47] WILL THE NEW EU HTA REGULATIONS INCREASE THE METHODOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS TO CONDUCTING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE?
    Rtveladze, K.
    Kamra, S.
    Gogna, S.
    Gaultney, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S310 - S310
  • [48] Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews
    Finfgeld-Connett, Deborah
    Johnson, E. Diane
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2013, 69 (01) : 194 - 204
  • [49] A Systematic Integrated Literature Review of Systematic Integrated Literature Reviews in Nursing
    Im, Eun-Ok
    Chang, Sun Ju
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (11) : 632 - U110
  • [50] The need for multivocal literature reviews in software engineering: complementing systematic literature reviews with grey literature
    Garousi, Vahid
    Felderer, Michael
    Mantyla, Mika V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2016 (EASE '16), 2016,