An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences

被引:89
|
作者
Koutsos, Thomas M. [1 ]
Menexes, Georgios C. [1 ]
Dordas, Christos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hellas, Sch Agr, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Agricultural research; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; METAANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY; TRIALS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Systematic review has generally been accepted as an effective, more complete, repeatable, and less biased type literature review that can successfully lead to evidence-based conclusions. This study attempts to develop a framework for systematic review with guidelines on how to conduct an effective systematic review for agricultural research. Systematic reviews require more time and effort but they can be used to conduct a comprehensive literature review, identifying potentially eligible articles on primary agricultural research and answering certain focused questions. A systematic review is also conducted as an example to examine whether systematic reviews are used in agricultural sciences. It was found that in the last two decades about a third (N = 29 out of 89 or 32.5%) of the eligible studies, classified as reviews related to agricultural research, are available as free full-text from publisher, while only eighteen of them were finally eligible to be included in this systematic review. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences
    Chapman, Karen
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2021, 47 (05):
  • [22] An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews
    Rens van de Schoot
    Jonathan de Bruin
    Raoul Schram
    Parisa Zahedi
    Jan de Boer
    Felix Weijdema
    Bianca Kramer
    Martijn Huijts
    Maarten Hoogerwerf
    Gerbrich Ferdinands
    Albert Harkema
    Joukje Willemsen
    Yongchao Ma
    Qixiang Fang
    Sybren Hindriks
    Lars Tummers
    Daniel L. Oberski
    Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3 : 125 - 133
  • [23] An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews
    van de Schoot, Rens
    de Bruin, Jonathan
    Schram, Raoul
    Zahedi, Parisa
    de Boer, Jan
    Weijdema, Felix
    Kramer, Bianca
    Huijts, Martijn
    Hoogerwerf, Maarten
    Ferdinands, Gerbrich
    Harkema, Albert
    Willemsen, Joukje
    Ma, Yongchao
    Fang, Qixiang
    Hindriks, Sybren
    Tummers, Lars
    Oberski, Daniel L.
    NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [24] Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews
    McManus, RJ
    Wilson, S
    Delaney, BC
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Hyde, CJ
    Tobias, RS
    Jowett, S
    Hobbs, FDR
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7172): : 1562 - 1563
  • [25] Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review
    van Dinter, Raymon
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    Catal, Cagatay
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 136
  • [26] Sustainable systematic literature reviews
    dos Santos, Vinicius
    Iwazaki, Anderson Y.
    Felizardo, Katia R.
    de Souza, Érica F.
    Nakagawa, Elisa Y.
    Information and Software Technology, 2024, 176
  • [27] On being 'systematic' in literature reviews in IS
    Boell, Sebastian K.
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 30 (02) : 161 - 173
  • [28] Modeling a Tool for Conducting Systematic Reviews Iteratively
    Bigendako, Brice
    Syriani, Eugene
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 552 - 559
  • [29] Pitfalls in conducting systematic reviews of acupuncture - Reply
    White, P
    Lewith, G
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 (10) : 1272 - 1273
  • [30] LESSONS LEARNED IN CONDUCTING COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Wells, Kristen
    Kumar, Ambuj
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S2336 - S2337