Mass Concentrations and Carbonaceous Compositions of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 at Urban Locations in Hanoi, Vietnam

被引:57
|
作者
Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy [1 ,2 ]
Nghiem Trung Dung [1 ]
Sekiguchi, Kazuhiko [3 ]
Ly Bich Thuy [1 ]
Nguyen Thi Thu Hien [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Ryosuke [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Thai Nguyen Univ Technol, Fac Int Training, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
[3] Saitama Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Sakura, Saitama, Japan
关键词
Nanoparticles; Organic carbon; Elemental carbon; SOC; PM2.5; PM10; Hanoi; Vietnam; RIVER DELTA REGION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; PARTICULATE MATTER; ELEMENTAL CARBON; FINE PARTICLES; ORGANIC-CARBON; ULTRAFINE; AEROSOL; ENVIRONMENTS; INDUSTRIAL;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0502
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
24-hour samples of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 were collected simultaneously for the first time at a roadside site (Vinacomin) and a mixed site (HUST) in Hanoi, Vietnam, during the wet (August) and dry seasons (October to December) in 2015. High levels of PM(0.)1 (6.06 +/- 2.71 mu g m(-3)), PM(2.)5 (71.06 +/- 47.52 mu g m(-3)), and PM10 (106.47 +/- 63.95 mu g m(-3)) were observed, especially in the rice straw open burning episode. The influence of some meteorological factors and trajectories on PM0.1 concentrations was negligible compared to larger particles. The average concentrations of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) for PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 were 2.77 +/- 0.98 mu g m(-3) and 0.63 +/- 0.32 mu g m(-3), 23.81 +/- 21.16 mu g m(-3) and 6.17 +/- 5.87 mu g m(-3), and 34.93 +/- 20.07 mu g m(-3) and 8.38 +/- 4.92 mu g m(-3), respectively. The total carbon (TC) accounted for 59.19%, 44.65%, and 43.79% of the mass of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively. The OC/EC ratios ranged 3.62-5.68, in which the ratios of PM0.1 were the highest, except for those in the biomass burning period. The char-EC/soot-EC ratios widely fluctuated (0.94-4.61), meaning higher efficiency in the source identification. Strong correlations between the OC and EC in all particle sizes were found (R-2 = 0.84-0.99), excluding those of PM0.1 in the dry season at Vinacomin (R-2 = 0.61), implying the influence of biomass burning. The concentrations of Secondary Organic Carbon (SOC) were 1.12 +/- 0.43 mu g m(-3), 9.49 +/- 8.26 mu g m(-3), and 9.59 +/- 7.72 mu g m(-3), accounting for 42.7%, 42.3%, and 27.9% of the total OC for PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively, indicating the dominant contribution of secondary sources to OC, especially in the finer particles. These results are highly valuable to Vietnam's database of atmospheric particles.
引用
收藏
页码:1591 / 1605
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PM10 and PM2.5 Concentrations in Urban Air and Size Fraction Distribution of Toxic Metals
    D'Innocenzio, F.
    Di Filippo, P.
    Lepore, L.
    Marconi, A.
    Annali di Chimica, 88 (3-4):
  • [42] Source apportionment for,urban PM10 and PM2.5 in the Beijing area
    Zhang Wei
    Guo JingHua
    Sun YeLe
    Yuan Hui
    Zhuang GuoShun
    Zhuang YaHui
    Hao ZhengPing
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2007, 52 (05): : 608 - 615
  • [43] Meteorological interpretation of measured urban PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area
    Pohjola, M
    Kousa, A
    Aarnio, P
    Koskentalo, T
    Kukkonen, J
    Härkönen, J
    Karppinen, A
    AIR POLLUTION VIII, 2000, 8 : 689 - 698
  • [44] Comparison between PAH mass concentrations measured in PM10 and PM2.5 particle fractions
    Sisovic, A
    Vadjic, Z
    Sega, K
    Beslic, I
    Vadjic, V
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 75 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [45] Comparison between PAH Mass Concentrations Measured in PM10 and Pm2.5 Particle Fractions
    A. Šišović
    Z. Vadjić
    K. Šega
    I. Bešlić
    V. Vadjić
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2005, 75 : 121 - 126
  • [46] Influences of wind and precipitation on different-sized particulate matter concentrations (PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5–10)
    Boen Zhang
    Limin Jiao
    Gang Xu
    Suli Zhao
    Xin Tang
    Yue Zhou
    Chen Gong
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2018, 130 : 383 - 392
  • [47] PM10, PM2.5, AND PM1 CONCENTRATIONS AND HEALTH EFFECTS IN TEXTILE FACTORIES
    Arslan, Selcuk
    Aybek, Ali
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (12A): : 8902 - 8916
  • [48] Analysis of PM10, PM2.5, and PM2.5-10 concentrations in Santiago, Chile, from 1989 to 2001
    Koutrakis, P
    Sax, SN
    Sarnat, JA
    Coull, B
    Demokritou, P
    Oyola, P
    Garcia, J
    Gramsch, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2005, 55 (03): : 342 - 351
  • [49] Spatial and temporal variations of the concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in China
    Wang, Y. Q.
    Zhang, X. Y.
    Sun, J. Y.
    Zhang, X. C.
    Che, H. Z.
    Li, Y.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (23) : 13585 - 13598
  • [50] Winter Mass Concentrations of Carbon Species in PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in Zagreb Air, Croatia
    Godec, Ranka
    Cackovic, Mirjana
    Sega, Kresimir
    Beslic, Ivan
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 89 (05) : 1087 - 1090