Mass Concentrations and Carbonaceous Compositions of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 at Urban Locations in Hanoi, Vietnam

被引:57
|
作者
Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy [1 ,2 ]
Nghiem Trung Dung [1 ]
Sekiguchi, Kazuhiko [3 ]
Ly Bich Thuy [1 ]
Nguyen Thi Thu Hien [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Ryosuke [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Thai Nguyen Univ Technol, Fac Int Training, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
[3] Saitama Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Sakura, Saitama, Japan
关键词
Nanoparticles; Organic carbon; Elemental carbon; SOC; PM2.5; PM10; Hanoi; Vietnam; RIVER DELTA REGION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; PARTICULATE MATTER; ELEMENTAL CARBON; FINE PARTICLES; ORGANIC-CARBON; ULTRAFINE; AEROSOL; ENVIRONMENTS; INDUSTRIAL;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2017.11.0502
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
24-hour samples of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 were collected simultaneously for the first time at a roadside site (Vinacomin) and a mixed site (HUST) in Hanoi, Vietnam, during the wet (August) and dry seasons (October to December) in 2015. High levels of PM(0.)1 (6.06 +/- 2.71 mu g m(-3)), PM(2.)5 (71.06 +/- 47.52 mu g m(-3)), and PM10 (106.47 +/- 63.95 mu g m(-3)) were observed, especially in the rice straw open burning episode. The influence of some meteorological factors and trajectories on PM0.1 concentrations was negligible compared to larger particles. The average concentrations of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) for PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10 were 2.77 +/- 0.98 mu g m(-3) and 0.63 +/- 0.32 mu g m(-3), 23.81 +/- 21.16 mu g m(-3) and 6.17 +/- 5.87 mu g m(-3), and 34.93 +/- 20.07 mu g m(-3) and 8.38 +/- 4.92 mu g m(-3), respectively. The total carbon (TC) accounted for 59.19%, 44.65%, and 43.79% of the mass of PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively. The OC/EC ratios ranged 3.62-5.68, in which the ratios of PM0.1 were the highest, except for those in the biomass burning period. The char-EC/soot-EC ratios widely fluctuated (0.94-4.61), meaning higher efficiency in the source identification. Strong correlations between the OC and EC in all particle sizes were found (R-2 = 0.84-0.99), excluding those of PM0.1 in the dry season at Vinacomin (R-2 = 0.61), implying the influence of biomass burning. The concentrations of Secondary Organic Carbon (SOC) were 1.12 +/- 0.43 mu g m(-3), 9.49 +/- 8.26 mu g m(-3), and 9.59 +/- 7.72 mu g m(-3), accounting for 42.7%, 42.3%, and 27.9% of the total OC for PM0.1, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively, indicating the dominant contribution of secondary sources to OC, especially in the finer particles. These results are highly valuable to Vietnam's database of atmospheric particles.
引用
收藏
页码:1591 / 1605
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of meteorological conditions on PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 concentrations during the monsoon season in Hanoi, Vietnam
    Hien, PD
    Bac, VT
    Tham, HC
    Nhan, DD
    Vinh, LD
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (21) : 3473 - 3484
  • [22] Identifying PM2.5 and PM0.1 Sources for Epidemiological Studies in California
    Hu, Jianlin
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Chen, Shuhua
    Ying, Qi
    Wiedinmyer, Christine
    Vandenberghe, Francois
    Kleeman, Michael J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (09) : 4980 - 4990
  • [23] Concentrations and estimated soot content of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in a subarctic urban atmosphere
    Vallius, MJ
    Ruuskanen, J
    Mirme, A
    Pekkanen, J
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (10) : 1919 - 1925
  • [24] Fireworks-a source of nanoparticles, PM2.5, PM10, and carbonaceous aerosols
    Pirker, Luka
    Velkavrh, Ziga
    Osite, Agnese
    Drinovec, Luka
    Mocnik, Grisa
    Remskar, Maja
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2022, 15 (07): : 1275 - 1286
  • [25] INDOOR PM1, PM2.5, PM10 AND OUTDOOR PM2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN SARI, IRAN
    Mohammadyan, Mahmoud
    Shabankhani, Bijan
    ARHIV ZA HIGIJENU RADA I TOKSIKOLOGIJU-ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 64 (03): : 371 - 377
  • [26] The Concentrations and Removal Effects of PM10 and PM2.5 on a Wetland in Beijing
    Li, Chunyi
    Huang, Yilan
    Guo, Huanhuan
    Wu, Gaojie
    Wang, Yifei
    Li, Wei
    Cui, Lijuan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [27] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    Williams, R
    Suggs, J
    Rodes, C
    Lawless, P
    Zweidinger, R
    Kwok, R
    Creason, J
    Sheldon, L
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (05): : 497 - 505
  • [28] PM10 and PM2.5:: an international perspective
    Sloss, LL
    Smith, IM
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 65 : 127 - 141
  • [29] Spectral dependence of light absorption and direct radiative forcing of the TSP, PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 in a rural region of northwestern China
    Qu, Yao
    Liu, Huikun
    Zhou, Yue
    Dai, Wenting
    Shi, Julian
    Wang, Nan
    Shi, Yingqiang
    Zhu, Chongshu
    Tsai, Chuenjinn
    Cao, Junji
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 292
  • [30] Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors
    RON WILLIAMS
    JACK SUGGS
    CHARLES RODES
    PHIL LAWLESS
    ROY ZWEIDINGER
    RICHARD KWOK
    JOHN CREASON
    LINDA SHELDON
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2000, 10 : 497 - 505