Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models

被引:13
|
作者
Im, Chang-Hee [1 ]
Park, Ji-Man [1 ]
Kim, Jang-Hyun [1 ]
Kang, You-Jung [1 ]
Kim, Jee-Hwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Coll Dent, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
dental computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM); intraoral scanner; 3-dimensional printer; quadrant model; trueness; IN-VIVO PRECISION; SCANNING SYSTEMS; DIGITAL METHODS; IMPRESSIONS; TRUENESS;
D O I
10.3390/ma13194419
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To assess the accuracy of various intraoral scanners (IOSs) and to investigate the existence of mutual compatibility that affects the accuracy between IOS and 3-dimensional (3D) printing using a scan quadrant model. For clinical implication, crown preparations and cavity design according to prosthetic diagnosis and treatment considerations must be acquired by a digital scanner. The selected typodont model was scanned using a reference scanner, from which reference (Ref) standard tessellation language (STL) data were created. Data obtained by scanning the typodont model with IOSs based on three different technologies were divided into three groups (CS3600, i500, and Trios3). Scanned data from the groups were divided into sub-groups of digital light processing (DLP), fused deposition modeling (FDM), and stereolithography apparatus (SLA), based on which 3D printed models (3DP) were fabricated. The 3DP dental models were scanned to obtain a total of 90 3DP STL datasets. The best-fit algorithm of 3D analysis software was used for teeth and arch measurements, while trueness was analyzed by calculating the average deviation among measured values based on superimposition of Ref and IOS and 3DP data. The differences between Ref and IOS (Ref-IOS), Ref and 3DP (Ref-IOS/3DP), and IOS and 3DP data (IOS-3DP) were compared and analyzed, while accuracy within each of the three main groups was assessed. For statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and repeated measures ANOVA test were used (p < 0.05). The major finding is that the mutual relationships between IOSs and 3D printers vary depending on the combination. However, i500 intraoral scanner and DLP 3D printer was the combination that showed the best trueness value.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D frameworks from 3D printers
    Ian D. Williams
    Nature Chemistry, 2014, 6 : 953 - 954
  • [22] Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base
    Rungrojwittayakul, Oraphan
    Kan, Joseph Y.
    Shiozaki, Kenzo
    Swamidass, Rajesh S.
    Goodacre, Brian J.
    Goodacre, Charles J.
    Lozada, Jaime L.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (02): : 124 - 128
  • [23] Assessment of dimensional accuracy of 3D printed part using resin 3D printing technique
    Dhanunjayarao, B. N.
    Naidu, N. V. Swamy
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 59 : 1608 - 1614
  • [24] Accuracy of Implant Analogs in 3D Printed Resin Models
    Maria, Rahmat
    Tan, Ming Yi
    Wong, Keng Mun
    Lee, Bruce Chi Hong
    Chia, Vanessa Ai Ping
    Tan, Keson Beng Choon
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (01): : 57 - 64
  • [26] Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study
    Ellakany, Passent
    Aly, Nourhan M.
    Al-Harbi, Fahad
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (06): : 521 - 528
  • [27] A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners
    Kouchi, Makiko
    Mochimaru, Masaaki
    Bradtmiller, Bruce
    Daanen, Hein
    Li, Peng
    Nacher, Beatriz
    Nam, Yunja
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 4010 - 4017
  • [28] 3D Printed Dental Models A comparative analysis
    Tancu, Ana Maria Cristina
    Pantea, Mihaela
    Totan, Alexandra
    Tanase, Mihaela
    Imre, Marina
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2019, 56 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [29] Origami for 3D printers
    Bradley, David
    MATERIALS TODAY, 2019, 22 : 5 - 5
  • [30] Intraoral Scanners for In Vivo 3D Imaging of the Gingiva and the Alveolar Process
    Winkler, Jonas
    Sculean, Anton
    Gkantidis, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)