Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study

被引:127
|
作者
Heaton, Janet [1 ]
Day, Jo [1 ]
Britten, Nicky [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Inst Hlth Res, Sch Med, St Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2SL, Devon, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2016年 / 11卷
关键词
Collaborative health research; Co-production; Knowledge translation; APPLIED HEALTH RESEARCH; LEADERSHIP; PROGRAM; CARE; TRANSLATION; STRATEGIES; ENGLAND; CLAHRCS;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine 'Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs. Methods: A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature. Results: We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production. Conclusions: In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co-production
    Klenk, Nicole
    Fiume, Anna
    Meehan, Katie
    Gibbes, Cerian
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (05)
  • [42] Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro)
    Robert K. D. McLean
    Fred Carden
    Alice B. Aiken
    Rebecca Armstrong
    Judy Bray
    Christine E. Cassidy
    Olivia Daub
    Erica Di Ruggiero
    Leslie A. Fierro
    Michelle Gagnon
    Alison M. Hutchinson
    Roman Kislov
    Anita Kothari
    Sara Kreindler
    Chris McCutcheon
    Jessica Reszel
    Gayle Scarrow
    Ian D. Graham
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 21
  • [43] Co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: a strategic compass for global research networks
    Schneider, Flurina
    Tribaldos, Theresa
    Adler, Carolina
    Biggs, Reinette
    de Bremond, Ariane
    Buser, Tobias
    Krug, Cornelia
    Loutre, Marie-France
    Moore, Sarah
    Norstrom, Albert, V
    Paulavets, Katsia
    Urbach, Davnah
    Spehn, Eva
    Wulser, Gabriela
    Zondervan, Ruben
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 49 : 127 - 142
  • [44] Overcoming barriers to knowledge co-production in academic-practitioner research collaboration
    McCabe, Angela
    Parker, Rachel
    Osegowitsch, Tom
    Cox, Stephen
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 41 (02) : 212 - 222
  • [45] Balancing Power and Co-production Comment on "Research Co-production: An Underused Pathway to Impact"
    Cameron, Jacqui
    Fiolet, Renee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 13
  • [46] "A shared human endeavor": farmer participation and knowledge co-production in agroecological research
    Maughan, Chris
    Anderson, Colin Ray
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [47] Beyond two communities - from research utilization and knowledge translation to co-production?
    Wehrens, R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 128 (06) : 545 - 551
  • [48] Knowledge co-production in practice: Enabling environmental management systems for ports through participatory research in the Dutch Wadden Sea
    Puente-Rodriguez, Daniel
    van Slobbe, Erik
    Al, Iris A. C.
    Lindenbergh, D. E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 55 : 456 - 466
  • [49] Shore up research co-production
    Kernecker, Maria
    Busse, Maria
    Zscheischler, Jana
    NATURE, 2019, 573 (7775) : 495 - 495
  • [50] Co-production of research topics and designs
    de Pury, John
    Wolfe, Charles
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2013, 18 : 1 - 1