Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study

被引:127
|
作者
Heaton, Janet [1 ]
Day, Jo [1 ]
Britten, Nicky [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Inst Hlth Res, Sch Med, St Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2SL, Devon, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2016年 / 11卷
关键词
Collaborative health research; Co-production; Knowledge translation; APPLIED HEALTH RESEARCH; LEADERSHIP; PROGRAM; CARE; TRANSLATION; STRATEGIES; ENGLAND; CLAHRCS;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine 'Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs. Methods: A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature. Results: We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production. Conclusions: In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introduction: participatory knowledge co-production
    Carrera, Jennifer
    Levidow, Les
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2025, 34 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [32] Resolving the unintended consequences of collective co-production through group co-production: a case study in Shanghai
    Zhao, Ting
    Yuan, Junao
    Wu, Zhongsheng
    Xu, Dongsheng
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [33] Comparative Urban Research From Theory To Practice: Co-Production For Sustainability
    Teo, Shaun S. K.
    SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF TROPICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 41 (03) : 472 - 474
  • [34] Democratising the discourse: co-production in art therapy practice, research and publication
    Springham, Neil
    Xenophontes, Ioanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ART THERAPY, 2021, 26 (1-2) : 1 - 7
  • [35] Co-production in healthcare: rhetoric and practice
    Vennik, Femke D.
    van de Bovenkamp, Hester M.
    Putters, Kim
    Grit, Kor J.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 82 (01) : 150 - 168
  • [36] From rules to collaborative practice: When regulatory mechanisms drive collective co-production
    Lino, Andre Feliciano
    Busanelli de Aquino, Andre Carlos
    de Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha
    Brumatti, Livia Martinez
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 39 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [37] Interactions between persons-Knowledge, decision making, and the co-production of practice
    Loughlin, Michael
    Buetow, Stephen
    Cournoyea, Michael
    Copeland, Samantha Marie
    Chin-Yee, Benjamin
    Fulford, K. W. M.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 911 - 920
  • [38] Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS): Case Study Analysis
    Zieba, Malgorzata
    Konczynski, Pawel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2017), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 1075 - 1083
  • [39] COVID-19 and Co-Production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice: Vol 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-Production
    Roesch-Marsh, Autumn
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 52 (06): : 3774 - 3776
  • [40] The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
    Large, Daniel
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,