What Are the Most Clinically Useful Cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Scores? A Systematic Review

被引:74
|
作者
Ebell, Mark H. [1 ]
Shinholser, JoAnna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SCORE; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The objective of this study is to systematically review the accuracy of the Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score and to identify optimal cutoffs for low- and high-risk populations. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature and identified 26 studies of the accuracy of the Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score. Data were abstracted in parallel, and only prospective, cohort studies that avoided verification bias were included. We calculated summary likelihood ratios for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, using all possible cutoffs based on available data, even if not reported in the original study. Results: The pretest probability of appendicitis was approximately 33% in studies of children and approximately 66% in studies of adults. Likelihood ratios at different cutoffs for the Alvarado score in adults were as follows: 0.03 (<4 points), 0.42 (4 to 6 points), and 3.4 (>= 7 points); and 0.01 (<5 points), 0.98 (5 to 8 points), and 6.7 (>= 9 points). Likelihood ratios for the Alvarado score in children were as follows: 0.02 (<4 points), 0.27 (4 to 6 points), and 4.2 (>= 7 points); and 0.04 (<5 points), 1.2 (5 to 8 points), and 8.5 (>= 9 points). For the Pediatric Appendicitis Score, likelihood ratios were 0.13 (<4 points), 0.70 (4 to 7 points), and 8.1 (>= 8 points). Conclusion: For children with a pretest probability of acute appendicitis of 60% or less, an Alvarado score below 4 rules out the diagnosis; this is also true for a score less than 5 if the pretest probability is up to approximately 40%. In adults with a pretest probability greater than or equal to 60%, an Alvarado score of 8 or higher rules in the diagnosis, whereas one of 9 or higher rules in the diagnosis at pretest probabilities greater than or equal to 40%. The Pediatric Appendicitis Score did not identify clinically useful low- or high-risk groups at typical pretest probabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 372
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What Quality and Safety of Care for Patients Admitted to Clinically Inappropriate Wards: a Systematic Review
    Micaela La Regina
    Francesca Guarneri
    Elisa Romano
    Francesco Orlandini
    Roberto Nardi
    Antonino Mazzone
    Andrea Fontanella
    Mauro Campanini
    Dario Manfellotto
    Tommaso Bellandi
    Gualberto Gussoni
    Riccardo Tartaglia
    Alessandro Squizzato
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2019, 34 : 1314 - 1321
  • [42] WHAT IS THE MOST BENEFICIAL TREATMENT OF FATIGUE IN PRIMARY SJOGREN'S SYNDROME? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Seneviratne, Anoushka C.
    Bhalara, Sundeept
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 : 135 - 135
  • [43] What are the most prevalent occupational health conditions among physical therapists? A systematic review
    Ferreira Resende, Marcia Colamarco
    Oliveira, Warley De Melo
    Padula, Rosimeire Simprini
    Menezes Costa, Luciola Da Cunha
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S220 - S221
  • [44] What is the most effective method for reducing pain during debonding procedures? A systematic review
    Jeha, Bahaa Aldeen
    Haddad, Rania
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2025, 23 (02)
  • [45] Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eun, S.
    Ho, I. G.
    Bae, G. E.
    Kim, H.
    Koo, C. M.
    Kim, M. K.
    Yoon, S. H.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (22) : 7097 - 7107
  • [46] Mean Platelet Volume in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Krishnan, Nellai
    Anand, Sachit
    Pakkasjarvi, Niklas
    Bajpai, Minu
    Dhua, Anjan Kumar
    Yadav, Devendra Kumar
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [47] CORR Insights®: What Are the Most Clinically Effective Nonoperative Interventions for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis? An Up-to-date Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Wolf, Jennifer Moriatis
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 483 (04) : 737 - 739
  • [48] No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Shin, Young-Soo
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Lee, Dae-Hee
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (04) : 1239 - 1248
  • [49] Psychosocial intervention for carers of people with dementia: What components are most effective and when? A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Dickinson, Claire
    Dow, Johanne
    Gibson, Grant
    Hayes, Louise
    Robalino, Shannon
    Robinson, Louise
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2017, 29 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [50] Are Early Warning Scores Useful Predictors for Mortality and Morbidity in Hospitalised Acutely Unwell Older Patients? A Systematic Review
    Jayasundera, Romesh
    Neilly, Mark
    Smith, Toby O.
    Myint, Phyo Kyaw
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (10)