What Are the Most Clinically Useful Cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Scores? A Systematic Review

被引:74
|
作者
Ebell, Mark H. [1 ]
Shinholser, JoAnna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SCORE; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The objective of this study is to systematically review the accuracy of the Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score and to identify optimal cutoffs for low- and high-risk populations. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature and identified 26 studies of the accuracy of the Alvarado score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score. Data were abstracted in parallel, and only prospective, cohort studies that avoided verification bias were included. We calculated summary likelihood ratios for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, using all possible cutoffs based on available data, even if not reported in the original study. Results: The pretest probability of appendicitis was approximately 33% in studies of children and approximately 66% in studies of adults. Likelihood ratios at different cutoffs for the Alvarado score in adults were as follows: 0.03 (<4 points), 0.42 (4 to 6 points), and 3.4 (>= 7 points); and 0.01 (<5 points), 0.98 (5 to 8 points), and 6.7 (>= 9 points). Likelihood ratios for the Alvarado score in children were as follows: 0.02 (<4 points), 0.27 (4 to 6 points), and 4.2 (>= 7 points); and 0.04 (<5 points), 1.2 (5 to 8 points), and 8.5 (>= 9 points). For the Pediatric Appendicitis Score, likelihood ratios were 0.13 (<4 points), 0.70 (4 to 7 points), and 8.1 (>= 8 points). Conclusion: For children with a pretest probability of acute appendicitis of 60% or less, an Alvarado score below 4 rules out the diagnosis; this is also true for a score less than 5 if the pretest probability is up to approximately 40%. In adults with a pretest probability greater than or equal to 60%, an Alvarado score of 8 or higher rules in the diagnosis, whereas one of 9 or higher rules in the diagnosis at pretest probabilities greater than or equal to 40%. The Pediatric Appendicitis Score did not identify clinically useful low- or high-risk groups at typical pretest probabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 372
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The outcomes of the most severe polytrauma patients: a systematic review of the use of high ISS cutoffs for performance measurement
    Hardy, Benjamin M.
    Varghese, Adrian
    Adams, Megan J.
    Enninghorst, Natalie
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (04) : 1305 - 1312
  • [22] Are we ready to predict late effects? A systematic review of clinically useful prediction models
    Salz, Talya
    Baxi, Shrujal S.
    Raghunathan, Nirupa
    Onstad, Erin E.
    Freedman, Andrew N.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Johansen, Christoffer
    Matasar, Matthew J.
    Brown, Peter de Nully
    Oeffinger, Kevin C.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (06) : 758 - 766
  • [23] Clinically most relevant psychometric properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale: a systematic review
    Zhang, Yongni
    Zang, Yaning
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [24] What is the most accurate method for detecting caries lesions? A systematic review
    Gimenez, Thais
    Tedesco, Tamara K.
    Janoian, Fernando
    Braga, Mariana Minatel
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    Deery, Christopher
    Ricketts, David N. J.
    Ekstrand, Kim Rud
    Mendes, Fausto M.
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 49 (03) : 216 - 224
  • [25] Diagnostic performance of serum interleukin-6 in pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review
    Arredondo Montero, Javier
    Bardaji Pascual, Carlos
    Bronte Anaut, Monica
    Lopez-Andres, Natalia
    Antona, Giuseppa
    Martin-Calvo, Nerea
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 18 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [26] Diagnostic performance of serum interleukin-6 in pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review
    Javier Arredondo Montero
    Carlos Bardají Pascual
    Mónica Bronte Anaut
    Natalia López-Andrés
    Giuseppa Antona
    Nerea Martín-Calvo
    World Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 18 : 91 - 99
  • [27] Clinical scores for acute appendicitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Alvarez-Lozada, Luis Adrian
    Fernandez-Reyes, Bernardo Alfonso
    Arrambide-Garza, Francisco Javier
    Garcia-Leal, Mariana
    Alvarez-Villalobos, Neri Alejandro
    Martinez-Garza, Javier Humberto
    Fernandez-Rodarte, Bernardo
    Elizondo-Omana, Rodrigo E.
    Quiroga-Garza, Alejandro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 240
  • [28] What Elements of the History, Examination, Laboratory Testing, or Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Are Most Useful in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children?
    Favot, Mark J.
    Ehrman, Robert R.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (06) : 797 - 798
  • [29] Rapid MRI Abdomen for Assessment of Clinically Suspected Acute Appendicitis in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review
    Dongchan Kim
    Benjamin Luke Woodham
    Kathryn Chen
    Vinushan Kuganathan
    Michael Benjamin Edye
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 1473 - 1485
  • [30] Rapid MRI Abdomen for Assessment of Clinically Suspected Acute Appendicitis in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review
    Kim, Dongchan
    Woodham, Benjamin Luke
    Chen, Kathryn
    Kuganathan, Vinushan
    Edye, Michael Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (07) : 1473 - 1485