Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial

被引:46
|
作者
Hayee, Bu'Hussain [1 ]
Dunn, Jason [1 ]
Loganayagam, Aathavan [1 ]
Wong, Mandy [1 ]
Saxena, Vishal [1 ]
Rowbotham, David [1 ]
McNair, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London SE18 4QH, England
关键词
SEDATION-FREE COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; DIFFICULTY; PETHIDINE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A combination of midazolant and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy. Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 300 Consecutive, unselected adults attending Outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time. Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower closes (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and < .05, respectively), whereas at higher closes of midazolam (>= 4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups. Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice. Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-close midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:681-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combination midazolam and fentanyl is more cost effective than combination midazolam and meperidine for endoscopic procedures.
    Gilman, RB
    Rowe, WA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (04) : 86 - 86
  • [32] Cardiopulmonary Safety of Propofol Versus Midazolam/Meperidine Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study
    Gurbulak, Bunyamin
    Uzman, Sinan
    Gurbulak, Esin Kabul
    Gul, Yasar Gokhan
    Toptas, Mehmet
    Baltali, Sevim
    Savas, Osman Anil
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (11)
  • [34] Propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl for upper gastrointestinal endomicroscopy: A randomized trial
    Zuo, Xiu-Li
    Li, Zhen
    Liu, Xiao-Ping
    Li, Chang-Qing
    Ji, Rui
    Wang, Peng
    Zhou, Cheng-Jun
    Liu, Han
    Li, Yan-Qing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (15) : 1814 - 1821
  • [35] Understanding the Results of a Randomized Trial of Screening Colonoscopy
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (17): : 1609 - 1611
  • [36] Safety and efficacy of etomidate/midazolam and propofol/midazolam sedations for screening colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Jung Min
    Choi, Seong Ji
    Jeon, Han Jo
    Jang, Sehyun
    Kim, Seung Han
    Lee, Jae Min
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Keum, Bora
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Kim, Chang Duck
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 255 - 255
  • [37] Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial
    DeWitt, John
    McGreevy, Kathleen
    Sherman, Stuart
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (03) : 499 - 509
  • [38] Fentanyl or Tramadol, with Midazolam, for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Analgesia, Sedation, and Safety
    Irina Hirsh
    Alexander Vaissler
    Josef Chernin
    Ori Segol
    Reuven Pizov
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006, 51 : 1946 - 1951
  • [39] Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Tuncali, Bahattin
    Pekcan, Yonca Ozvardar
    Celebi, Arzu
    Zeyneloglu, Pinar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2015, 27 (04) : 301 - 306
  • [40] Fentanyl or tramadol, with midazolam, for outpatient colonoscopy: Analgesia, sedation, and safety
    Hirsh, Irina
    Vaissler, Alexander
    Chernin, Josef
    Segol, Ori
    Pizov, Reuven
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (11) : 1946 - 1951