Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial

被引:46
|
作者
Hayee, Bu'Hussain [1 ]
Dunn, Jason [1 ]
Loganayagam, Aathavan [1 ]
Wong, Mandy [1 ]
Saxena, Vishal [1 ]
Rowbotham, David [1 ]
McNair, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London SE18 4QH, England
关键词
SEDATION-FREE COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; DIFFICULTY; PETHIDINE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A combination of midazolant and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy. Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 300 Consecutive, unselected adults attending Outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time. Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower closes (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and < .05, respectively), whereas at higher closes of midazolam (>= 4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups. Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice. Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-close midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:681-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized comparison of recovery time after use of remifentanil alone versus midazolam and meperidine for colonoscopy anesthesia
    Hong, Mi Jin
    Sung, In-Kyung
    Lee, Sang Pyo
    Cheon, Bo-Kyung
    Kang, Hyun
    Kim, Tae-Yop
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 27 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [22] A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan W.
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory G.
    Kochman, Michael L.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (02): : 434 - 439
  • [23] A randomized controlled double blind trial of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy with propofol/remifentanil vs. midazolam/fentanyl
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Kochman, Michael L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S520 - S521
  • [24] A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Sedation Between Fentanyl/Midazolam and Meperidine/Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Endoscopy
    Patel, Neal C.
    Heckman, Michael G.
    Palmer, William C.
    Cangemi, David
    DeVault, Kenneth R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (05): : 772 - 774
  • [25] RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MEPERIDINE AND FENTANYL DURING LABOR
    RAYBURN, WF
    SMITH, CV
    PARRIOTT, JE
    WOODS, RE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 74 (04): : 604 - 606
  • [26] RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MEPERIDINE AND FENTANYL DURING LABOR
    GOODLIN, RC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 75 (02): : 308 - 308
  • [27] Propofol versus meperidine and midazolam as a conscious sedation in percutaneous vertebroplasty: Prospective randomized trial
    Amer, Asmaa Fawzy
    Salama, Eman Ramadan
    Elatrozy, Hytham Ibrahim
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2018, 19 (02): : 56 - 60
  • [28] A comparison of midazolam plus fentanyl or pethidine as sedation for colonoscopy
    Hayee, BH
    Rowbotham, DS
    Saxena, V
    McNair, A
    GUT, 2006, 55 : A4 - A5
  • [29] Clinical trial: a randomized, study comparing meperidine (pethidine) and fentanyl in adult gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Robertson, D. J.
    Jacobs, D. P.
    Mackenzie, T. A.
    Oringer, J. A.
    Rothstein, R. I.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 29 (08) : 817 - 823
  • [30] NASAL OXYGEN ALLEVIATES HYPOXEMIA IN COLONOSCOPY PATIENTS SEDATED WITH MIDAZOLAM AND MEPERIDINE
    GROSS, JB
    LONG, WB
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (01) : 26 - 29