Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial

被引:46
|
作者
Hayee, Bu'Hussain [1 ]
Dunn, Jason [1 ]
Loganayagam, Aathavan [1 ]
Wong, Mandy [1 ]
Saxena, Vishal [1 ]
Rowbotham, David [1 ]
McNair, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London SE18 4QH, England
关键词
SEDATION-FREE COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; DIFFICULTY; PETHIDINE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A combination of midazolant and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy. Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 300 Consecutive, unselected adults attending Outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time. Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower closes (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and < .05, respectively), whereas at higher closes of midazolam (>= 4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups. Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice. Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-close midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:681-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Double-Blind, Randomised Trial of Midazolam with Fentanyl Or Pethidine (Meperidine) As Sedation for Colonoscopy
    Hayee, Bu'Hussain
    Rowbotham, David S.
    Saxena, Vishal
    Mcnair, Alistair
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB191 - AB191
  • [2] Comparison of Fentanyl versus Meperidine in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Colonoscopy in Korea
    Hong, Gwan Woo
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Lee, Jung Hyeon
    Bong, Ji Hun
    Choi, Sung Hun
    Cho, Hyeki
    Nam, Ji Hyung
    Jang, Dong Kee
    Kang, Hyoun Woo
    Kim, Jae Hak
    Lim, Yun Jeong
    Koh, Moon Soo
    Lee, Jin Ho
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 53 (05) : 562 - 567
  • [3] EFFICACY OF SEDATION AND ANALGESIA BY MIDAZOLAM IN ASSOCIATION WITH MEPERIDINE OR FENTANYL FOR ELECTIVE COLONOSCOPY
    Gallusi, G.
    Donato, G.
    Panetta, C.
    Palma, R.
    Pontone, P.
    Borghini, R.
    Lauriola, M.
    Pontone, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 : E215 - E216
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial of Entonox® versus midazolam-fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy
    Maslekar, S.
    Gardiner, A.
    Hughes, M.
    Culbert, B.
    Duthie, G. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (04) : 361 - 368
  • [5] Comparison of meperidine plus midazolam and fentanyl plus midazolam in procedural sedation: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Suna Soysal
    Ozgur Karcioglu
    Ahmet Demircan
    Hakan Topacoglu
    Mustafa Serinken
    Niyazi Ozucelik
    Kazim Tirpan
    Ali Gunerli
    Advances in Therapy, 2004, 21 : 312 - 321
  • [6] Comparison of meperidine plus midazolam and fentanyl plus midazolam in procedural sedation: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Soysal, S
    Karcioglu, O
    Demircan, A
    Topacoglu, H
    Serinken, M
    Ozucelik, N
    Tirpan, K
    Gunerli, A
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2004, 21 (05) : 312 - 321
  • [7] SEDATION FOR COLONOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF DIAZEPAM MEPERIDINE, MIDAZOLAM FENTANYL AND PROPOFOL FENTANYL COMBINATIONS
    KOSTASH, MA
    JOHNSTON, R
    BAILEY, RJ
    KONOPAD, EM
    GUTHRIE, LP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01): : 27 - 31
  • [8] Single bolus of midazolam versus bolus midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
    Radaelli, F
    Meucci, G
    Terruzzi, V
    Spinzi, G
    Imperiali, G
    Strocchi, E
    Lenoci, N
    Terreni, N
    Mandelli, G
    Minoli, G
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [9] Patients Prefer Propofol to Midazolam Plus Fentanyl for Sedation for Colonoscopy: Results of a Single-Center Randomized Equivalence Trial
    Schroeder, Caleb
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Tocco-Bradley, Rosalie
    Obear, Janet
    Welch, Kathleen B.
    Winter, Suzanne
    Cleary, Robert K.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [10] Single bolus of midazolam vs. midazolam plus meperidine for colonoscopy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
    Radaelli, F
    Meucci, G
    Terruzzi, V
    Spinzi, G
    Imperiali, G
    Strocchi, E
    Lenoci, N
    Mandelli, G
    Toldi, A
    Terreni, N
    Minoli, G
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (05) : AB81 - AB81