Transcranial alternating current stimulation and its effects on cognition and the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Bin Lee, Ainsley Ryan Yan [2 ]
Yau, Chun En [2 ]
Mai, Aaron Shengting [2 ]
Tan, Weiling Amanda [2 ]
Ong, Bernard Soon Yang [2 ]
Yam, Natalie Elizabeth [2 ]
Ho, Cyrus Su Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Psychol Med, NUHS Tower Block,Level 9,1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, MBBS Programme, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
cognition; cognitive impairment; depression; non-invasive brain stimulation; schizophrenia; GAMMA-TACS; WORKING-MEMORY; DEPRESSION; ADULTS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; COMORBIDITY; MEDICATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/20406223221140390
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background:Transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that is hypothesised to alter cortical excitability and brain electrical activity, modulating functional connectivity within the brain. Several trials have demonstrated its potential in treating psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia. Objectives:To study the efficacy of TACS in ameliorating symptoms of depression and schizophrenia in patients and its effects on cognition in patients and healthy subjects compared to sham stimulation. Design:Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data Sources and Methods:This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42022331149) is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PsycINFO were searched from inception to March 2022. Only randomised-controlled trials were included. Results:A total of 12 randomised-controlled trials are reviewed for meta-analysis, with three randomised-controlled trials reporting only effects on cognition in psychiatric and cognitively impaired patients, three trials on cognition in healthy subjects, one trial on cognition in both patients and healthy subjects, one trial on only depression, two on both cognition and depression in patients and two on schizophrenia symptoms. No studies were at significant risk of bias. For cognition, TACS showed significant improvement [positive standardised mean differences (SMD) denoting improvement] over sham stimulation in those with psychiatric disorders with an SMD of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14, 1.06). Similarly, among patients with depression, an SMD of 1.14 (95% CI: 0.10, 2.18) was found significantly favouring TACS over sham stimulation. Two studies assessed the effect of TACS on schizophrenia symptoms with mixed results. Conclusion:TACS has shown promise in ameliorating symptoms of both schizophrenia and depression in patients. TACS also improves cognition in both patients and healthy subjects. However, these findings are limited by the sample size of included studies, and future studies may be required to better our understanding of the potential of TACS. Registration:PROSPERO (CRD42022331149)
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation treatment for major depressive disorders: Consideration from a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Hatano, Masakazu
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Iwata, Nakao
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2025, 374 : 616 - 618
  • [42] The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, C. -C.
    Khalifa, N.
    Vollm, B.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 737 - 750
  • [43] Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebellar ataxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Di
    Wang, Ju
    Ma, Jiang
    Lu, Li
    Jin, Song
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [44] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Tinnitus: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wang, Tang-Chuan
    Tyler, Richard S.
    Chang, Ta-Yuan
    Chen, Jui-Cheng
    Lin, Chia-Der
    Chung, Hsiung-Kwang
    Tsou, Yung-An
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02): : 79 - 88
  • [45] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Repeated Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Migraine
    Cai, Guoshuai
    Xia, Zhu
    Charvet, Leigh
    Xiao, Feifei
    Datta, Abhishek
    Androulakis, X. Michelle
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 1171 - 1183
  • [46] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Xiang
    Liu, Huiyu
    Liu, Zicai
    Rao, Jinzhu
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Pu
    Gong, Xiaoqian
    Wen, Youliang
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 13
  • [47] Transcranial direct current stimulation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Sara
    Lugo-Marin, Jorge
    Setien-Ramos, Imanol
    Gisbert-Gustemps, Laura
    Arteaga-Henriquez, Gara
    Diez-Villoria, Emiliano
    Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 48 : 89 - 109
  • [48] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guttesen, Liv Liebach
    Albert, Nikolai
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 143 : 163 - 175
  • [49] Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiozawa, Pedro
    Fregni, Felipe
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Lotufo, Paulo A.
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Daskalakis, Jeff Z.
    Cordeiro, Quirino
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 17 (09): : 1443 - 1452
  • [50] EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION IN FIBROMYALGIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Zhu, Chang-E
    Yu, Bo
    Zhang, Wen
    Chen, Wen-Hua
    Qi, Qi
    Miao, Yun
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 49 (01) : 2 - 9