Transcranial alternating current stimulation and its effects on cognition and the treatment of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Bin Lee, Ainsley Ryan Yan [2 ]
Yau, Chun En [2 ]
Mai, Aaron Shengting [2 ]
Tan, Weiling Amanda [2 ]
Ong, Bernard Soon Yang [2 ]
Yam, Natalie Elizabeth [2 ]
Ho, Cyrus Su Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Psychol Med, NUHS Tower Block,Level 9,1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, MBBS Programme, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
cognition; cognitive impairment; depression; non-invasive brain stimulation; schizophrenia; GAMMA-TACS; WORKING-MEMORY; DEPRESSION; ADULTS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; COMORBIDITY; MEDICATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/20406223221140390
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background:Transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that is hypothesised to alter cortical excitability and brain electrical activity, modulating functional connectivity within the brain. Several trials have demonstrated its potential in treating psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia. Objectives:To study the efficacy of TACS in ameliorating symptoms of depression and schizophrenia in patients and its effects on cognition in patients and healthy subjects compared to sham stimulation. Design:Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data Sources and Methods:This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42022331149) is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PsycINFO were searched from inception to March 2022. Only randomised-controlled trials were included. Results:A total of 12 randomised-controlled trials are reviewed for meta-analysis, with three randomised-controlled trials reporting only effects on cognition in psychiatric and cognitively impaired patients, three trials on cognition in healthy subjects, one trial on cognition in both patients and healthy subjects, one trial on only depression, two on both cognition and depression in patients and two on schizophrenia symptoms. No studies were at significant risk of bias. For cognition, TACS showed significant improvement [positive standardised mean differences (SMD) denoting improvement] over sham stimulation in those with psychiatric disorders with an SMD of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14, 1.06). Similarly, among patients with depression, an SMD of 1.14 (95% CI: 0.10, 2.18) was found significantly favouring TACS over sham stimulation. Two studies assessed the effect of TACS on schizophrenia symptoms with mixed results. Conclusion:TACS has shown promise in ameliorating symptoms of both schizophrenia and depression in patients. TACS also improves cognition in both patients and healthy subjects. However, these findings are limited by the sample size of included studies, and future studies may be required to better our understanding of the potential of TACS. Registration:PROSPERO (CRD42022331149)
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dissanayaka, Thusharika D.
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Farrell, Michael
    Egan, Gary F.
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES, 2018, 29 (02) : 223 - 232
  • [32] Modulation of Electrophysiology by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Minah
    Bin Kwak, Yoo
    Lee, Tae Young
    Kwon, Jun Soo
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 15 (05) : 434 - 444
  • [33] Effect of multi-session prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Narita, Zui
    Stickley, Andrew
    DeVylder, Jordan
    Yokoi, Yuma
    Inagawa, Takuma
    Yamada, Yuji
    Maruo, Kazushi
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Oh, Hans
    Sawa, Akira
    Sumiyoshi, Tomiki
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2020, 216 : 367 - 373
  • [34] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability
    Meron, Daniel
    Hedger, Nicholas
    Garner, Matthew
    Baldwin, David S.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 57 : 46 - 62
  • [35] Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lloyd, Donna M.
    Wittkopf, Priscilla G.
    Arendsen, Laura J.
    Jones, Anthony K. P.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 21 (11-12): : 1085 - 1100
  • [36] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on walking ability after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yi
    Fan, Jingjing
    Yang, Jingyi
    He, Chengqi
    Li, Shasha
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 36 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [37] The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on clinical symptoms in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Pak Wing Calvin
    Louie, Larissa Lok Chi
    Wong, Yiu Lung
    Wong, Sau Man Corine
    Leung, Wing Yin
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Chan, Wai Chi
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 53
  • [38] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yi
    Li, He -Ping
    Wu, Ming-Xia
    Wang, Qian-Ye
    Zeng, Xi
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 142 : 1 - 10
  • [39] The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dong, Ke
    Meng, Shifeng
    Guo, Ziqi
    Zhang, Rufang
    Xu, Panpan
    Yuan, Erfen
    Lian, Tao
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [40] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression -: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin, JLR
    Barbanoj, MJ
    Schlaepfer, TE
    Thompson, E
    Pérez, V
    Kulisevsky, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 182 : 480 - 491