Comparison of photoelectrochromic devices with different layer configurations

被引:53
|
作者
Hauch, A [1 ]
Georg, A
Krasovec, UO
Orel, B
机构
[1] Freiburg Mat Res Ctr, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Solar Energy Syst, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Natl Inst Chem, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
D O I
10.1149/1.1496487
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
We prepared photoelectrochromic devices, which can be switched from transparent to dark, by adding an electrochromic layer (WO3) to a dye-sensitized solar cell. Layers in different orders are compared: first, the TiO2 layer situated above the WO3 layer; second, the WO3 layer situated above the TiO2 layer; and third, the TiO2 and WO3 layers situated on opposite electrodes, leaving out the Pt layer. For the first and second configuration, fast and intense coloring is possible together with fast bleaching, which is in principle not possible for the third. The comparison of the first and the second configurations demonstrated that it is possible to exchange the positions of the TiO2 and WO3 layers. The layers were prepared by dipping the samples in sols and we found that material of the second layer penetrates the first layer, which influences the kinetics of the coloring and bleaching. For the first configuration, we showed that it is possible to switch the transmittance not only from the illuminated to the nonilluminated state, but also during continuous illumination. For the first configuration and under 1 sun of illumination, the visual transmittance changed from 51 to 4.8%. Switching times are about 3 min for coloring and bleaching. (C) 2002 The Electrochemical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:H159 / H163
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance evaluation and comparison of three-terminal energy selective electron devices with different connective ways and filter configurations
    Peng, Wanli
    Zhang, Yanchao
    Yang, Zhimin
    Chen, Jincan
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2018, 133 (02):
  • [32] Comparison of Vernier Machines with Different Rotor PM Configurations
    Liu, Guopeng
    Sui, Yi
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Wang, Mingqiao
    Yang, Longlong
    Zheng, Ping
    2019 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND SYSTEMS (ICEMS 2019), 2019, : 5455 - 5458
  • [33] Oxidative Coupling of Methane: A Comparison of Different Reactor Configurations
    Cruellas, Aitor
    Melchiori, Tommaso
    Gallucci, Fausto
    Annaland, Martin van Sint
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [34] Comparison of Rim Sealing Effectiveness in Different Geometrical Configurations
    Orsini, L.
    Picchi, A.
    Facchini, B.
    Bonini, A.
    Innocenti, L.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2025, 147 (02):
  • [35] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MESFET CONFIGURATIONS IN TERMS OF MICROWAVE PERFORMANCE
    TRAUT, FA
    VANDERMERWE, DG
    SNYMAN, LW
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1991, 87 (3-4) : 113 - 116
  • [36] Performance evaluation and comparison of three-terminal energy selective electron devices with different connective ways and filter configurations
    Wanli Peng
    Yanchao Zhang
    Zhimin Yang
    Jincan Chen
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 133
  • [37] Thermal performance comparison of different sun tracking configurations☆
    Achkari, O.
    El Fadar, A.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2020, 88 (02):
  • [38] COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID CODERS UNDER DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS
    GUNASEKARAN, S
    RAINA, JP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1983, 397 : 140 - 148
  • [39] Comparison of Different HFSLM Configurations for Separation of Neodymium and Uranium
    Sharma, Ajay D.
    Patwardhan, Ashwin W.
    Ansari, Seraj A.
    Mohapatra, Prasanta K.
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 50 (03) : 332 - 342
  • [40] Comparison of Different Antenna Configurations for Probing of Layered Media
    Varianytsia-Roshchupkina, Liudmyla A.
    Pochanin, Gennadiy P.
    Pochanina, Iryna Ye.
    Masalov, Sergey A.
    2015 8TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (IWAGPR), 2015,