Comparison of photoelectrochromic devices with different layer configurations

被引:53
|
作者
Hauch, A [1 ]
Georg, A
Krasovec, UO
Orel, B
机构
[1] Freiburg Mat Res Ctr, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Solar Energy Syst, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Natl Inst Chem, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
D O I
10.1149/1.1496487
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
We prepared photoelectrochromic devices, which can be switched from transparent to dark, by adding an electrochromic layer (WO3) to a dye-sensitized solar cell. Layers in different orders are compared: first, the TiO2 layer situated above the WO3 layer; second, the WO3 layer situated above the TiO2 layer; and third, the TiO2 and WO3 layers situated on opposite electrodes, leaving out the Pt layer. For the first and second configuration, fast and intense coloring is possible together with fast bleaching, which is in principle not possible for the third. The comparison of the first and the second configurations demonstrated that it is possible to exchange the positions of the TiO2 and WO3 layers. The layers were prepared by dipping the samples in sols and we found that material of the second layer penetrates the first layer, which influences the kinetics of the coloring and bleaching. For the first configuration, we showed that it is possible to switch the transmittance not only from the illuminated to the nonilluminated state, but also during continuous illumination. For the first configuration and under 1 sun of illumination, the visual transmittance changed from 51 to 4.8%. Switching times are about 3 min for coloring and bleaching. (C) 2002 The Electrochemical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:H159 / H163
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Photoelectrochromic devices: Influence of device architecture and electrolyte composition
    Costa, Claudia
    Mesquita, Isabel
    Andrade, Luisa
    Mendes, Adelio
    ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2016, 219 : 99 - 106
  • [22] "Partly covered" photoelectrochromic devices with enhanced coloration speed and efficiency
    Leftheriotis, G.
    Syrrokostas, G.
    Yianoulis, P.
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2012, 96 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [23] Comparison between different data buses configurations
    Lopez, A
    Deschacht, D
    VLSI 2004: IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 69 - 74
  • [24] Comparison of the mixing efficiency of different injector configurations
    Winnemoeller, Tobias
    Meinke, Matthias
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2015, 117 : 262 - 272
  • [25] Comparison of different configurations of NbTi magnetic lenses
    Zhang, Z. Y.
    Matsumoto, S.
    Choi, S.
    Teranishi, R.
    Kiyoshi, T.
    SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 24 (10):
  • [26] COMPARISON OF THE BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT JET CONFIGURATIONS IN A CROSSFLOW
    Lewandowski, Michael
    Kristo, Paul
    Weiss, Abdullah
    Kimber, Mark
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING (ICONE2020), VOL 3, 2020,
  • [27] Optimization and comparison for different Raman amplifier configurations
    Liu, XM
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2004, 21 (09) : 1756 - 1758
  • [28] Comparison on different tracking configurations in GNSS receivers
    Tang X.
    Chen X.
    Xiu J.
    Chen X.
    2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology (26): : 623 - 628
  • [29] Comparison of different configurations of Phase Doppler Analyser
    Zaremba, Matous
    Maly, Milan
    Jedelsky, Jan
    Jicha, Miroslav
    EFM15 - EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS 2015, 2016, 114
  • [30] The Challenge for Building Integration of Highly Transparent Photovoltaics and Photoelectrochromic Devices
    Cannavale, Alessandro
    Martellotta, Francesco
    Fiorito, Francesco
    Ayr, Ubaldo
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (08)