Consistency of small-field dosimetry, on and off axis, in beam-matched linacs used for stereotactic radiosurgery

被引:6
|
作者
Munoz, Luis [1 ,2 ]
Kron, Tomas [2 ,3 ]
Petasecca, Marco [2 ]
Bucci, Joseph [4 ,5 ]
Jackson, Michael [2 ,6 ]
Metcalfe, Peter [2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [2 ]
Biasi, Giordano [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Genesiscare Flinders Private Hosp, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] St George Hosp, St George Canc Care Ctr, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
[5] Genesiscare Waratah Private Hosp, Hurstville, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2021年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Elekta; matched linacs; off-axis; small-field dosimetry; SRS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; ARRAY; DETECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13160
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be delivered with a standard linear accelerator (linac). At institutions having more than one linac, beam matching is common practice. In the literature, there are indications that machine central axis (CAX) matching for broad fields does not guarantee matching of small fields with side <= 2 cm. There is no indication on how matching for broad fields on axis translates to matching small fields off axis. These are of interest to multitarget single-isocenter (MTSI) SRS planning and the present work addresses that gap in the literature. Methods: We used 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) beams from four Elekta VersaHD (R) linacs equipped with an Agility (TM) multileaf collimator (MLC). The linacs were strictly matched for broad fields on CAX. We compared output factors (OPFs) and effective field size, measured concurrently using a novel 2D solid-state dosimeter "Duo" with a spatial resolution of 0.2 mm, in square and rectangular static fields with sides from 0.5 to 2 cm, either on axis or away from it by 5 to 15 cm. Results: Among the four linacs, OPF for fields >= 1 x 1 cm(2) ranged 1.3% on CAX, whereas off axis a maximum range of 1.9% was observed at 15 cm. A larger variability in OPF was noted for the 0.5 x 0.5 cm(2) field, with a range of 5.9% on CAX, which improved to a maximum of 2.3% moving off axis. Two linacs showed greater consistency with a range of 1.4% on CAX and 2.2% at 15 cm off axis. Between linacs, the effective field size varied by <0.04 cm in most cases, both on and off axis. Tighter matching was observed for linacs with a similar focal spot position. Conclusions: Verification of small-field consistency for matched linacs used for SRS is an important task for dosimetric validation. A significant benefit of concurrent measurement of field size and OPF allowed for a comprehensive assessment using a novel diode array. Our study showed the four linacs, strictly matched for broad fields on CAX, were still matched down to a field size of 1 x 1 cm(2) on and off axis.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Dosimetric effects on small-field beam-modeling for stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Woong Cho
    Suzy Kim
    Jung-In Kim
    Hong-Gyun Wu
    Joo-Young Jung
    Min-Joo Kim
    Tae-Suk Suh
    Jin-Young Kim
    Jong Won Kim
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 66 : 678 - 693
  • [22] Evaluation of patient-specific quality assurance for fractionated stereotactic treatment plans with 6 and 10MV photon beams in beam-matched linacs
    Kannan, Mageshraja
    Saminathan, Sathiyan
    Chandraraj, Varatharaj
    Shwetha, B.
    Raj, D. Gowtham
    Ganesh, K. M.
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (04) : 896 - 906
  • [23] Small Field Dosimetry: Detector Dependency On Output Factor and Off-Axis-Ratio Measurements for a Novel Radiosurgery System
    Pinnaduwage, D.
    Srivastava, S.
    Yan, X.
    Jani, S.
    Jenkins, C.
    Weidlich, G.
    Bodduluri, M.
    Sorensen, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E218 - E218
  • [24] Small-field beam data acquisition, detector dependency, and film-based validation for a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system
    Pinnaduwage, Dilini S.
    Srivastava, Shiv P.
    Yan, Xiangsheng
    Jani, Shyam S.
    Jenkins, Cesare
    Barani, Igor J.
    Sorensen, Stephen
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) : 6121 - 6136
  • [25] Small-field dosimetry based on reduced graphene oxide under MeV helium beam irradiation
    Torrisi, L.
    Cutroneo, M.
    Torrisi, A.
    Silipigni, L.
    Havranek, V.
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2020, 175 (1-2): : 120 - 135
  • [26] K-band EPR dosimetry: small-field beam profile determination with miniature alanine dosimeter
    Chen, F
    Graeff, CFO
    Baffa, O
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2005, 62 (02) : 267 - 271
  • [27] Assessment of new small-field detectors against standard-field detectors for practical stereotactic beam data acquisition
    McKerracher, C
    Thwaites, DI
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (09): : 2143 - 2160
  • [28] Evaluation of NanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter for Cone-shaped Small-field Dosimetry of Cyberknife Stereotactic Radiosurgery Unit: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Dosimetric Verification Study
    Akyol, Fadil
    Sarigul, Neslihan
    Yeginer, Mete
    Yedekci, Yagiz
    Utku, Haluk
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 44 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [29] Beam matching for small-field dosimetry applications using accelerator solenoid current and a miniature plastic scintillation detector
    Gingras, Luc
    Beaulieu, Frederic
    Besnier, Magali
    Cote, Benjamin
    Leblanc, Danahe
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Archambault, Louis
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (08) : 5627 - 5628
  • [30] Small-Field Dosimetry in Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Irradiation for Brain Metastases Using a Detector-Specific Field Output Correction Factor
    Ono, T.
    Nakamura, M.
    Uto, M.
    Mizowaki, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)