Infrastructure Equity and Firm Performance in India

被引:3
|
作者
Hasnat, Tanzeem [1 ]
机构
[1] India Habitat Ctr, Res & Informat Syst Dev Countries, Core 4-B,Fourth Floor,Lodhi Rd, New Delhi 110003, India
关键词
Infrastructure finance; CAPM; M-GARCH; cash flow; leverage; India;
D O I
10.1177/0976399620948318
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The growing financing requirements coupled with tightening of fiscal purse strings point to the pertinence of market-based finance for infrastructure provision and enhancement. For this, the question of the sectoral performance of infrastructure takes centre stage and this becomes the basis for the present study. The study assesses the risk-return and volatility profile of Nifty Infra, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) sectoral index for the 30 biggest infrastructure firms in India vis-a-vis the broader Nifty 50 for the time period 2010-2018. The study employs the standard financial economic analysis methods of capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity in mean (M-GARCH) model and finds the sectoral equity performance of infrastructure to be marginally below that of a broadly diversified index. Further, the study analyses the cash flow and leverage characteristics which are imperative factors in medium-term risk-return profile of infrastructure stocks. The disaggregated firm level analysis of 10 select firms reveals that rent-like return does exist for the biggest players in the sector due to past installed capacities, while the subcontracting mechanism percolates to meagre cash flows for smaller players, partly bearing the greenfield risks. This suggests the need for state-induced measures to prop up liquidity in equity trade for infrastructure firms. This would not only enhance the risk-return profile but also mitigate excessive volatility for these heavily leveraged firms.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 115
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minority and majority private equity investments: firm performance and governance
    Battistin E.
    Bortoluzzi P.
    Buttignon F.
    Vedovato M.
    Journal of Management & Governance, 2017, 21 (3) : 659 - 684
  • [22] Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and firm performance in India
    Maji, Santi Gopal
    Lohia, Prachi
    SOCIETY AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2023, 18 (01) : 175 - 194
  • [23] Equity Concentration, Executive Equity Incentive and Firm Performance -Based on Merger Enterprise Sample Data
    Lan, Xiuwen
    Zhang, Haiyu
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY (HSMET 2017), 2017, : 580 - 585
  • [24] The Effect Environmental Performance, Environmental Disclosure, Firm Size, and Return on Equity on Economic Performance
    Lie, Darwin
    Ikhsan, Arfan
    Jubi
    Harmain, Hendra
    Nasution, Murni Dahlena
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2020, 21 (174): : 118 - 120
  • [25] Brand Equity and Firm Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Analysts' Recommendations
    Wang, Kui
    Jiang, Wei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [26] Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility
    Mahabubur Rahman
    M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano
    Mary Lambkin
    Journal of Brand Management, 2019, 26 : 691 - 704
  • [27] The dynamics of CEO equity vs. inside debt and firm performance
    Pollock, Susan
    Switzer, Lorne N.
    Wang, Jun
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2023, 64
  • [28] Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility
    Rahman, Mahabubur
    Angeles Rodriguez-Serrano, M.
    Lambkin, Mary
    JOURNAL OF BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (06) : 691 - 704
  • [29] Network centrality, learning capacity and firm performance in equity alliance portfolios
    Belgraver, Herman
    Verwaal, Ernst
    Verdu-Jover, Antonio J.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2025, 63 (01) : 307 - 337
  • [30] Equity agency costs in payouts, pension plan manipulation and firm performance
    Halman, Rony
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2013, 39 (11) : 1056 - 1076