Cost-Benefit Evaluation of Decentralized Greywater Reuse Systems in Rural Public Schools in Chile

被引:19
|
作者
Rodriguez, Carolina [1 ,2 ]
Sanchez, Rafael [3 ]
Rebolledo, Natalia [4 ]
Schneider, Nicolas [4 ]
Serrano, Jennyfer [5 ]
Leiva, Eduardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Ingn Hidraul & Ambiental, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Quim & Farm, Dept Quim Inorgan, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Inst Geog, Avda Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[4] Fdn Alto Desierto, Omar Elorza 704, Ovalle 1842274, Chile
[5] Univ Mayor, Escuela Biotecnol, Camino La Piramide 5750, Santiago 8580745, Chile
关键词
greywater; water scarcity; water reuse; economic analysis; WATER SCARCITY; ACTIVATED CARBON; GREEN AREAS; FEASIBILITY; AGRICULTURE; COMFORT;
D O I
10.3390/w12123468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water scarcity is one of the most important climatic threats in recent times. In Chile, the north and north-central areas, with predominantly arid or semi-arid climates, have been strongly affected by the low availability of water, as well as by overexploitation of water resources derived from the negative effect caused by some sectors of the economy such as agriculture and mining. Only 53% of households in rural areas in Chile have access to drinking water from a public network. To date, some pilot greywater treatment systems have been implemented in rural public schools. This paper presents an economic analysis of pilot systems for greywater treatment from three case studies. The results showed that the implementation of these systems would not be economically feasible, since the initial investment costs can exceed USD 5200, which is not offset by the water savings. However, other benefits, such as thermal regulation, better life quality, and the feeling of well-being and satisfaction of students and teachers should be considered to be paramount for the evaluation of treatment systems. In addition, current levels of treated greywater could allow irrigation of 6.24, 5.68, and 3.56 m(2)/person in the Alejandro Chelen, El Guindo, and Pedro de Valdivia schools, respectively. These results contribute to a better understanding of the social role that should be applied to the evaluation of ecological systems that save water and improve the well-being of the population.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION IN THE RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF THE COLON
    PISTOLESI, GF
    DATTOMA, N
    GUIEN, C
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 1980, 61 (6-7): : 447 - 449
  • [42] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF URBAN INFORMATION SYSTEMS
    LEYLAND, G
    EKISTICS, 1970, 30 (176): : 77 - 80
  • [43] Cost-benefit analysis of environmental management systems
    Kern, S
    PAPIER, 1999, 53 (03): : 152 - 153
  • [44] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Crash Cushion Systems
    Schrum, Kevin D.
    De Albuquerque, Francisco D. B.
    Sicking, Dean L.
    Lechtenberg, Karla A.
    Faller, Ronald K.
    Reid, John D.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [45] Public Investment and Cost-Benefit Analysis in the European Union
    Florio, Massimo
    Myles, Gareth
    FISCAL STUDIES, 2011, 32 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [46] COST-BENEFIT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT - WHATS ITS WORTH
    JOHN, T
    MASS TRANSIT, 1983, 10 (11) : 14 - 15
  • [47] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND PUBLIC EXPENDITURE - PETERS,GH
    CULYER, A
    SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ADMINISTRATION, 1967, 1 (01): : 58 - 60
  • [48] Cost-benefit quantification of ISHM in aerospace systems
    Hoyle, Christopher
    Mehr, Alexander F.
    Tumer, Irern Y.
    Chen, Wei
    27TH COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 2, PTS A AND B 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2008, : 975 - 984
  • [49] On quantifying cost-benefit of ISHM in aerospace systems
    Hoyle, C.
    Mehr, A.
    Tumer, I.
    Chen, W.
    2007 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2007, : 4209 - +
  • [50] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND INVESTMENT IN THE PUBLIC-SECTOR
    FELDSTEIN, MS
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1965, 43 (02) : 224 - 224