Cost-Benefit Evaluation of Decentralized Greywater Reuse Systems in Rural Public Schools in Chile

被引:19
|
作者
Rodriguez, Carolina [1 ,2 ]
Sanchez, Rafael [3 ]
Rebolledo, Natalia [4 ]
Schneider, Nicolas [4 ]
Serrano, Jennyfer [5 ]
Leiva, Eduardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Ingn Hidraul & Ambiental, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Quim & Farm, Dept Quim Inorgan, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Inst Geog, Avda Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 7820436, Chile
[4] Fdn Alto Desierto, Omar Elorza 704, Ovalle 1842274, Chile
[5] Univ Mayor, Escuela Biotecnol, Camino La Piramide 5750, Santiago 8580745, Chile
关键词
greywater; water scarcity; water reuse; economic analysis; WATER SCARCITY; ACTIVATED CARBON; GREEN AREAS; FEASIBILITY; AGRICULTURE; COMFORT;
D O I
10.3390/w12123468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water scarcity is one of the most important climatic threats in recent times. In Chile, the north and north-central areas, with predominantly arid or semi-arid climates, have been strongly affected by the low availability of water, as well as by overexploitation of water resources derived from the negative effect caused by some sectors of the economy such as agriculture and mining. Only 53% of households in rural areas in Chile have access to drinking water from a public network. To date, some pilot greywater treatment systems have been implemented in rural public schools. This paper presents an economic analysis of pilot systems for greywater treatment from three case studies. The results showed that the implementation of these systems would not be economically feasible, since the initial investment costs can exceed USD 5200, which is not offset by the water savings. However, other benefits, such as thermal regulation, better life quality, and the feeling of well-being and satisfaction of students and teachers should be considered to be paramount for the evaluation of treatment systems. In addition, current levels of treated greywater could allow irrigation of 6.24, 5.68, and 3.56 m(2)/person in the Alejandro Chelen, El Guindo, and Pedro de Valdivia schools, respectively. These results contribute to a better understanding of the social role that should be applied to the evaluation of ecological systems that save water and improve the well-being of the population.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulator & Simulation Models for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Software Reuse Policies
    Suri, P. K.
    Garg, Neeraj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2008, 8 (07): : 282 - 291
  • [32] A Cost-Benefit Model for Sustainable Product Reuse and Repurposing in Circular Remanufacturing
    Psarommatis, Foivos
    May, Gokan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [33] Evaluating earthquake retrofitting measures for schools: A cost-benefit analysis
    Smyth, A. W.
    Deodatis, G.
    Franco, G.
    He, Y.
    Gurvich, T.
    KEEPING SCHOOLS SAFE IN EARTHQUAKES, 2004, : 208 - 216
  • [34] Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Biobanks based on Cost-benefit Analysis
    Ang Li
    Innovation and Development Policy, 2024, 6 (01) : 75 - 95
  • [35] A clinical and cost-benefit evaluation of five facebows
    Samet, N
    Smidt, A
    Samet, N
    Weiss, EI
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 33 (07): : 511 - 515
  • [36] COST-BENEFIT CRITERIA FOR URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES
    DODGSON, JS
    TOPHAM, N
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 1986, 4 (02): : 177 - 185
  • [37] AVIONICS SYSTEMS FACE COST-BENEFIT HURDLES
    HUGHES, D
    AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 141 (12): : 43 - 44
  • [38] Workshop: Social Cost-Benefit Analyses in Public Health
    De Wit, Ardine
    Van Gils, Paul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [39] COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING SERVICES
    STREETER, DN
    IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 1972, 11 (03) : 219 - &
  • [40] BEWARE OF THE COST-BENEFIT MODEL FOR IS PROJECT EVALUATION
    LAY, PMW
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1985, 36 (06): : 30 - 35