Meta-analysis methods for risk differences

被引:7
|
作者
Bonett, Douglas G. [1 ]
Price, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Psychol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] E Tennessee State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
关键词
CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; ARIPIPRAZOLE; PROPORTIONS; PLACEBO; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/bmsp.12024
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of effect size in studies where the response variable is dichotomous. Confidence interval methods based on a varying coefficient model are proposed for combining and comparing risk differences from multi-study between-subjects or within-subjects designs. The proposed methods are new alternatives to the popular constant coefficient and random coefficient methods. The proposed varying coefficient methods do not require the constant coefficient assumption of effect size homogeneity, nor do they require the random coefficient assumption that the risk differences from the selected studies represent a random sample from a normally distributed superpopulation of risk differences. The proposed varying coefficient methods are shown to have excellent finite-sample performance characteristics under realistic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 387
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meta-analysis: Methods, strengths, and weaknesses
    Buyse, M
    Piedbois, P
    Piedbois, Y
    Carlson, RW
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2000, 14 (03): : 437 - 443
  • [32] A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis
    Brockwell, SE
    Gordon, IR
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (06) : 825 - 840
  • [33] Better methods for meta-analysis available
    Pace, Nathan L.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (06) : 1350 - 1350
  • [34] Meta-analysis in surgery - Methods and limitations
    Ng, Tina T.
    McGory, Marcia L.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Maggard, Melinda A.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2006, 141 (11) : 1125 - 1130
  • [35] Effective methods of biofumigation: a meta-analysis
    E Kathryn Morris
    Rachel Fletcher
    Stavros D. Veresoglou
    Plant and Soil, 2020, 446 : 379 - 392
  • [36] A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference
    Price, Robert M., Jr.
    Bonett, Douglas G.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2015, 85 (12) : 2378 - 2383
  • [37] Fluoroquinolones and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Network Meta-analysis
    Gorelik, Einat
    Masarwa, Reem
    Perlman, Amichai
    Rotshild, Victoria
    Abbasi, Momen
    Muszkat, Mordechai
    Matok, Ilan
    DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 42 (04) : 529 - 538
  • [38] Metacognitive beliefs in individuals at risk for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences
    Baumgartner, Josef
    Litvan, Zsuzsa
    Koch, Marlene
    Hinterbuchinger, Barbara
    Friedrich, Fabian
    Baumann, Lukas
    Mossaheb, Nilufar
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIE, 2020, 34 (03) : 108 - 115
  • [39] Fluoroquinolones and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and Network Meta-analysis
    Einat Gorelik
    Reem Masarwa
    Amichai Perlman
    Victoria Rotshild
    Momen Abbasi
    Mordechai Muszkat
    Ilan Matok
    Drug Safety, 2019, 42 : 529 - 538
  • [40] GEOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES IN THE RISK OF SURGERY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hansen, Tawnya
    Mak, Joyce
    Underwood, Fox
    Windsor, Joseph
    King, James
    Quan, Joshua
    Buie, Michael
    Coward, Stephanie
    Frolkis, Alex
    Leung, Alexander
    Ma, Christopher
    Novak, Kerri
    Panaccione, Remo
    Qian, Yiming
    Burisch, Johan
    Gearry, Richard
    Ng, Siew
    Kaplan, Gilaad
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2022, 28