Meta-analysis methods for risk differences

被引:7
|
作者
Bonett, Douglas G. [1 ]
Price, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Psychol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] E Tennessee State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
关键词
CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; ARIPIPRAZOLE; PROPORTIONS; PLACEBO; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/bmsp.12024
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of effect size in studies where the response variable is dichotomous. Confidence interval methods based on a varying coefficient model are proposed for combining and comparing risk differences from multi-study between-subjects or within-subjects designs. The proposed methods are new alternatives to the popular constant coefficient and random coefficient methods. The proposed varying coefficient methods do not require the constant coefficient assumption of effect size homogeneity, nor do they require the random coefficient assumption that the risk differences from the selected studies represent a random sample from a normally distributed superpopulation of risk differences. The proposed varying coefficient methods are shown to have excellent finite-sample performance characteristics under realistic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 387
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sex differences in the relation of diabetes as risk factor for CHD death: A meta-analysis
    Goldbourt, U
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (14) : E251 - E251
  • [22] Extending methods for investigating the relationship between treatment effect and baseline risk from pairwise meta-analysis to network meta-analysis
    Achana, Felix A.
    Cooper, Nicola J.
    Dias, Sofia
    Lu, Guobing
    Rice, Stephen J. C.
    Kendrick, Denise
    Sutton, Alex J.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (05) : 752 - 771
  • [23] An illustrated guide to the methods of meta-analysis
    Sutton, AJ
    Abrams, KR
    Jones, DR
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (02) : 135 - 148
  • [24] Meta-analysis methods for diagnostic accuracy
    Begg, Colin B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (11) : 1081 - 1082
  • [25] Research and scholarly methods: Meta-analysis
    Baker, William L.
    Sobieraj, Diana M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 4 (09): : 1170 - 1178
  • [26] Trial sequential methods for meta-analysis
    Kulinskaya, Elena
    Wood, John
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (03) : 212 - 220
  • [27] A Study on Multilevel Meta-Analysis Methods
    Sen, Sedat
    Akbas, Nihal
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2016, 7 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [28] Meta-analysis of genome searches: Methods
    Lewis, CM
    Wise, LH
    Levinson, DF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2002, 114 (07): : 700 - 700
  • [29] Effective methods of biofumigation: a meta-analysis
    Morris, E. Kathryn
    Fletcher, Rachel
    Veresoglou, Stavros D.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2020, 446 (1-2) : 379 - 392
  • [30] Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Song, FJ
    Sheldon, TA
    Sutton, AJ
    Abrams, KR
    Jones, DR
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (02) : 126 - 151