Evaluation of heterogeneous factors of low-grade prostate cancer in patients before and after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Veliev, E., I [1 ,2 ]
Goncharuk, D. A. [1 ]
Sokolov, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
Ivkin, E., V [2 ]
Paklina, O., V [2 ]
Setdikova, G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Med Acad Continuing Profess Educ, Minist Hlth Russia, Build 1,2-1 Barrikadnaya St, Moscow 125993, Russia
[2] SP Botkin City Clin Hosp, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 52nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2020年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen kinetics; prostate biopsy; biochemical recurrence; ANTIGEN VELOCITY; GLEASON SCORE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DOUBLING TIME; RISK; MEN; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-70-79
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: to determine the degree of heterogeneity of prastate cancer Gleason 6 (3 + 3) by assessing: long-term ontological results, mismatch of pre- and postoperative degree of prastate cancer aggressiveness, preoperative clinical component. Materials and methods. 528 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and Gleasonos preoperative score of 6 (3 + 3). All patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1(n =151) - Gleason 6, prostate specific antigen (PSA) density <0.15 ng/ml/cm(3), <= 4 positive biopsy cores, <50 % lesion of the biopsy cores, group 2 (n = 229) - Gleason 6, PSA <10 ng/ml and group 3 (n =148) - Gleason 6, PSA >10 ng/ml. Results. Statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2 were observed only when assessing PSA velocity (p <0.017). The median time to the development of biochemical relapse (BCR) in the study population was 12 (3-77) months. BCR in group 1 was observed in 1.98 % of patients, in group 2 and 3 - 786 and 14.19 %, respectively. Statistically significant differences in the time of onset of BCR within 2 years after surgery were found between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.002) and group I and 3 (p = 0.0001). An increase in the degree of malignancy after surgery in group 1 was determined only in 13 % of patients, in group 2 in 27 %, in group 3 in 43 % of patients. The contribution of a greater postoperative degree of malignancy of prostate cancer to the development of BCR in group 1 was 1.32 % (2 out of 3 patients). Thus, in group 1 in the case of true Gleason 6 (3 + 3), the probability of BCR was 0.66 %. Conclusion. PSA velocity before surgery showed a statistical difference between groups 1 and 2. Based on long-term ontological results after surgery, heterogeneous behavior of the tumor is observed among the study groups. Group 1 in comparison with group 2 and 3 showed the lowest frequency of increase in the Gleason score and the likelihood of developing BCR after surgery. These results may be useful in planning an individual patient treatment plan.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Racial disparities in mortality for patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Wen, Wanqing
    Luckenbaugh, Amy N.
    Bayley, Christina E.
    Pension, David F.
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (09) : 1517 - 1528
  • [42] Outcome of Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Patients
    Suzuki, Kazumi
    Nakano, Kazuhiko
    Morita, Tatsuo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [43] Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Clarke, Noel
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Graefen, Markus
    Ost, Piet
    Zietman, Anthony Laurence
    Roach, Mack, III
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 689 - 709
  • [44] Among men with low-grade prostate cancer on prostate biopsy, the 4Kscore to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness at prostatectomy.
    Nahar, Bruno
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Zappala, Stephen M.
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Parekh, Dipen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [46] Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
    Pastuszak, Alexander W.
    Pearlman, Amy M.
    Lai, Win Shun
    Godoy, Guilherme
    Sathyamoorthy, Kumaran
    Liu, Joceline S.
    Miles, Brian J.
    Lipshultz, Larry I.
    Khera, Mohit
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02): : 639 - 644
  • [47] SELECTIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER
    Moghul, Masood
    Mcnally, Claire
    Kaur, Kaljit
    Kinsella, Netty
    Dafydd, Derfel
    Sohaib, Aslam
    Hazell, Steve
    Cahill, Declan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E983 - E984
  • [48] Prognostic factors for and outcome of locally advanced prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Hsu, Chao-Yu
    Wildhagen, Mark F.
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Bangma, Chris H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (11) : 1536 - 1540
  • [49] Factors associated with a delay in diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Hoffman, K. E.
    Chen, M.
    Nguyen, P. L.
    Bennett, C. L.
    Sartor, A. O.
    Stein, K.
    Kuban, D. A.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [50] Risk Factors for Relapse of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy in Chinese Population
    You, Pinghong
    Xu, Liuting
    Tang, Liangyou
    Wang, Chunyang
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (03) : 155 - 161