Evaluation of heterogeneous factors of low-grade prostate cancer in patients before and after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Veliev, E., I [1 ,2 ]
Goncharuk, D. A. [1 ]
Sokolov, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
Ivkin, E., V [2 ]
Paklina, O., V [2 ]
Setdikova, G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Med Acad Continuing Profess Educ, Minist Hlth Russia, Build 1,2-1 Barrikadnaya St, Moscow 125993, Russia
[2] SP Botkin City Clin Hosp, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 52nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2020年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen kinetics; prostate biopsy; biochemical recurrence; ANTIGEN VELOCITY; GLEASON SCORE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DOUBLING TIME; RISK; MEN; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-70-79
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: to determine the degree of heterogeneity of prastate cancer Gleason 6 (3 + 3) by assessing: long-term ontological results, mismatch of pre- and postoperative degree of prastate cancer aggressiveness, preoperative clinical component. Materials and methods. 528 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and Gleasonos preoperative score of 6 (3 + 3). All patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1(n =151) - Gleason 6, prostate specific antigen (PSA) density <0.15 ng/ml/cm(3), <= 4 positive biopsy cores, <50 % lesion of the biopsy cores, group 2 (n = 229) - Gleason 6, PSA <10 ng/ml and group 3 (n =148) - Gleason 6, PSA >10 ng/ml. Results. Statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2 were observed only when assessing PSA velocity (p <0.017). The median time to the development of biochemical relapse (BCR) in the study population was 12 (3-77) months. BCR in group 1 was observed in 1.98 % of patients, in group 2 and 3 - 786 and 14.19 %, respectively. Statistically significant differences in the time of onset of BCR within 2 years after surgery were found between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.002) and group I and 3 (p = 0.0001). An increase in the degree of malignancy after surgery in group 1 was determined only in 13 % of patients, in group 2 in 27 %, in group 3 in 43 % of patients. The contribution of a greater postoperative degree of malignancy of prostate cancer to the development of BCR in group 1 was 1.32 % (2 out of 3 patients). Thus, in group 1 in the case of true Gleason 6 (3 + 3), the probability of BCR was 0.66 %. Conclusion. PSA velocity before surgery showed a statistical difference between groups 1 and 2. Based on long-term ontological results after surgery, heterogeneous behavior of the tumor is observed among the study groups. Group 1 in comparison with group 2 and 3 showed the lowest frequency of increase in the Gleason score and the likelihood of developing BCR after surgery. These results may be useful in planning an individual patient treatment plan.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of Testosterone Deficiency and Risk Factors in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
    Ahn, S.
    Hwang, W.
    Jo, S. B.
    Kim, J. W.
    Oh, M. M.
    Park, H. S.
    Moon, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [32] Prognostic factors of prostate cancer systemic progression in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Demeshko, P. D.
    Krasny, S. A.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2013, 9 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [33] Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Schieda, Nicola
    Sim, Jordan
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Morash, Chris
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Robertson, Susan J.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 472 (02) : 205 - 212
  • [34] Writing fluency in patients with low-grade glioma before and after surgery
    Antonsson, Malin
    Johansson, Charlotte
    Hartelius, Lena
    Henriksson, Ingrid
    Longoni, Francesca
    Wengelin, Asa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2018, 53 (03) : 592 - 604
  • [35] Emotion Recognition in Patients with Low-Grade Glioma before and after Surgery
    Buunk, Anne M.
    Gerritsen, Marleen J. J.
    Jeltema, Hanne-Rinck
    Wagemakers, Michiel
    Metzemaekers, Jan D. M.
    Groen, Rob J. M.
    Spikman, Jacoba M.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [36] Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Baniel, J
    Israilov, S
    Segenreich, E
    Livne, PM
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (01) : 58 - 62
  • [37] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LOW-GRADE PROSTATE-CANCER ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY - A RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY STUDY OF TUMOR GRADE, VOLUME, AND STAGE OF THE BIOPSIED AND MULTIFOCAL TUMOR
    EPSTEIN, JI
    STEINBERG, GD
    CANCER, 1990, 66 (09) : 1927 - 1932
  • [38] New prostate cancer grade grouping system predicts survival after radical prostatectomy
    Erickson, Andrew
    Sandeman, Kevin
    Landensuo, Kanerva
    Nordling, Stig
    Kallajoki, Markku
    Seikkula, Heikki
    Butzow, Anna
    Vasarainen, Hanna
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    Taimen, Pekka
    Rannikko, Antti
    Mirtti, Tuomas
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 75 : 159 - 166
  • [39] RADIOTHERAPY AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PROSTATE CANCER
    Lainez, C.
    Vila, A.
    Sanchez-Reyes, A.
    Artola, N.
    Moya, L. M.
    Julia, J. C.
    Pedro, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S338 - S339
  • [40] Circulating microRNAs and Kallikreins before and after Radical Prostatectomy: Are They Really Prostate Cancer Markers?
    Egidi, Maria Giulia
    Cochetti, Giovanni
    Serva, Maria Rita
    Guelfi, Gabriella
    Zampini, Danilo
    Mechelli, Luca
    Mearini, Ettore
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013