Evaluation of heterogeneous factors of low-grade prostate cancer in patients before and after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Veliev, E., I [1 ,2 ]
Goncharuk, D. A. [1 ]
Sokolov, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
Ivkin, E., V [2 ]
Paklina, O., V [2 ]
Setdikova, G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Med Acad Continuing Profess Educ, Minist Hlth Russia, Build 1,2-1 Barrikadnaya St, Moscow 125993, Russia
[2] SP Botkin City Clin Hosp, Moscow Healthcare Dept, 52nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2020年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen kinetics; prostate biopsy; biochemical recurrence; ANTIGEN VELOCITY; GLEASON SCORE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; DOUBLING TIME; RISK; MEN; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-70-79
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: to determine the degree of heterogeneity of prastate cancer Gleason 6 (3 + 3) by assessing: long-term ontological results, mismatch of pre- and postoperative degree of prastate cancer aggressiveness, preoperative clinical component. Materials and methods. 528 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and Gleasonos preoperative score of 6 (3 + 3). All patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1(n =151) - Gleason 6, prostate specific antigen (PSA) density <0.15 ng/ml/cm(3), <= 4 positive biopsy cores, <50 % lesion of the biopsy cores, group 2 (n = 229) - Gleason 6, PSA <10 ng/ml and group 3 (n =148) - Gleason 6, PSA >10 ng/ml. Results. Statistically significant differences between group 1 and group 2 were observed only when assessing PSA velocity (p <0.017). The median time to the development of biochemical relapse (BCR) in the study population was 12 (3-77) months. BCR in group 1 was observed in 1.98 % of patients, in group 2 and 3 - 786 and 14.19 %, respectively. Statistically significant differences in the time of onset of BCR within 2 years after surgery were found between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.002) and group I and 3 (p = 0.0001). An increase in the degree of malignancy after surgery in group 1 was determined only in 13 % of patients, in group 2 in 27 %, in group 3 in 43 % of patients. The contribution of a greater postoperative degree of malignancy of prostate cancer to the development of BCR in group 1 was 1.32 % (2 out of 3 patients). Thus, in group 1 in the case of true Gleason 6 (3 + 3), the probability of BCR was 0.66 %. Conclusion. PSA velocity before surgery showed a statistical difference between groups 1 and 2. Based on long-term ontological results after surgery, heterogeneous behavior of the tumor is observed among the study groups. Group 1 in comparison with group 2 and 3 showed the lowest frequency of increase in the Gleason score and the likelihood of developing BCR after surgery. These results may be useful in planning an individual patient treatment plan.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 79
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Final Pathological Outcomes in Men with Low-Grade Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Smyth, L. G.
    Walsh, K. W.
    Rogers, E.
    Durkan, G. C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 182 : S337 - S337
  • [2] Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer
    Sanguedolce, Francesca
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Castellan, Pietro
    Di Nauta, Michele
    Silecchia, Giovanni
    Bruno, Salvatore M.
    Russo, Davide
    Treacy, Patrick-Julien
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Cormio, Luigi
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (10) : 793.e19 - 793.e25
  • [3] Urodynamic evaluation of patients with localized prostate cancer before and 4 months after robotic radical prostatectomy
    Lee, Dong Sup
    Lee, Seung-ju
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [4] Urodynamic evaluation of patients with localized prostate cancer before and 4 months after robotic radical prostatectomy
    Dong Sup Lee
    Seung-ju Lee
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [5] Emphasizing the role of Wnt5a protein expression to predict favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer
    Khaja, Azharuddin Sajid Syed
    Egevad, Lars
    Helczynski, Leszek
    Wiklund, Peter
    Andersson, Tommy
    Bjartell, Anders
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2012, 1 (01): : 96 - 104
  • [6] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LOW-GRADE PROSTATE-CANCER ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY (NB) - CORRELATION WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    EPSTEIN, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1990, 62 (01) : A31 - A31
  • [7] The role of radical prostatectomy in patients with high grade prostate cancer
    Tiguert, R
    Gheiler, EL
    Tefilli, MV
    Banerjee, M
    Pontes, JE
    Wood, DP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 61 - 61
  • [8] Dynamic thiol/disulphide homeostasis before and after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Hanikoglu, Ferhat
    Hanikoglu, Aysegul
    Kucuksayan, Ertan
    Alisik, Murat
    Gocener, Ahmet Anil
    Erel, Ozcan
    Baykara, Mehmet
    Cuoghi, Aurora
    Tomasi, Aldo
    Ozben, Tomris
    FREE RADICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 50 : S79 - S84
  • [9] Efficacy of radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer patients and analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, Xinping
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Lin, Yang
    Tian, Yuxin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (06): : 2623 - 2628
  • [10] EVALUATION OF RISK FACTORS FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Surcel, Cristian
    Mirvald, Cristian
    Pavelescu, Cristian
    Mihai, Victor
    Najjar, Salam
    Savu, Carmen
    Sinescu, I.
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (04): : 111 - 125